2005
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31847-7_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested Constraints and Application Conditions for High-Level Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SPO is capable of removing nodes and their incident edges from the graph, including dangling edges [20]. Algebraic approaches can be extended by additional application conditions, such as existence and non-existence of certain nodes and edges [21], as well as conditions that are repeated frequently in the original graph and known as nested conditions [22]. PROV-GTS is an algebraic graph transformation system that consists of a set of rules based on the single-pushout approach.…”
Section: Prov Graph Transformation System (Prov-gts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPO is capable of removing nodes and their incident edges from the graph, including dangling edges [20]. Algebraic approaches can be extended by additional application conditions, such as existence and non-existence of certain nodes and edges [21], as well as conditions that are repeated frequently in the original graph and known as nested conditions [22]. PROV-GTS is an algebraic graph transformation system that consists of a set of rules based on the single-pushout approach.…”
Section: Prov Graph Transformation System (Prov-gts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the railroad control case study, originally considered in [Pen04,HP05], and the external car platooning case study [Bau06,HESV91] are both fully verified. Also, the verification of the access control system, to which the 3 unverified program specifications belong, can be seen as successful, as we were able to show the invariance of the conjunction ACConstraint with respect to AccessControl.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…On the other hand, we present a calculus for proving conditions and show its soundness. We evaluate our approach and the implementations of the aforementioned transformations and algorithms by modeling and verifying three different case studies: a railroad control [Pen04,HP05], an access control for computer systems [HPR06], and, as an external example, a car platoon maneuver protocol [Bau06,HESV91]. We show that our implementation is able to decide 327 of 330 considered test specifications.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations