Nest architecture, life cycle, and natural enemies of the neotropical leafcutting bee Megachile (Moureapis) maculata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in a montane forest
Abstract:-Studies on the nesting biology of cavity nesting hymenoptera (bees and wasps) have stimulated many questions related to the behavior, life cycle, trophic niche, and sex ratio to better understanding of the life history of insects. Leafcutting bees are common insects, and many are important and efficient pollinators of crops and other plants. We studied the nesting biology of Megachile (Moureapis ) maculata in a montane semi-deciduous forest in Brazil using trap nests in order to improve the knowledge of aspec… Show more
“…The bees cut and collect circular to elliptical leaf pieces (Figure ) and line the brood cells with a roll of layered discs. A single brood cell may contain 50–100 leaf discs; depending on the size of the cavity, an aboveground nest may contain 1–11 brood cells (MacIvor, ; Sabino & Antonini, ), while the subterranean nests contain a single brood cell (Williams et al., ). The leaf discs are also used to partition the brood cells.…”
Aim: Leafcutter bees use plants as pollen and nectar sources, but also cut leaf discs and use them to line their nests. Which plant species they choose as nesting material and why they do so have remained obscure. We asked the following: (1) How are the plant species used by leafcutter bees distributed phylogenetically? (2) Does plant choice differ across geographical regions, and if so, in what ways? (3) Are the leaf plant species natives or exotics? (4) What plant and leaf traits predict selection of plant species by leafcutter bees? And (5) Does the abundance of individuals per species in the habitat influence leafcutter bees' plant preferences? Location: Tropical South Asia, temperate eastern Canada and US Sonoran Desert Methods: We mapped taxa known to be used by leafcutter bees both from our own study and published literature onto the most recent angiosperm phylogeny. To determine what plant and leaf traits predict leaf selection, we monitored 6,120 individuals of 214 native and exotic plant species planted in a 3-sq. km. arboretum in Arizona and recorded leaf damage inflicted by bees.Results: Megachile showed a strong preference for species in the rosid clade, particularly the phylogenetic cluster of Fabales, Fagales and Rosales. Thirty-two to forty-five percentage of the leaf plant species were exotic to a given region. Membership in the rosid clade and Fabaceae family predicted plant preference, whereas the plant species' local abundance and geographical origin did not. Leaf water content, morphotype and the presence of latex were important factors influencing plant choice, whereas leaf shape and size did not.
Main conclusion:These patterns point to plant groups whose availability should be monitored to assure persistence of leafcutter bees. Their preference for specific globally distributed plant clades, yet ability to readily adopt certain exotic plant species as nest resources, likely augments their ability to persist.
K E Y W O R D Santimicrobial, biogeography, distribution, diversity, evolution, herbivory, leafcutter bee, Megachile, Megachilidae, pollinator, urban ecosystem
“…The bees cut and collect circular to elliptical leaf pieces (Figure ) and line the brood cells with a roll of layered discs. A single brood cell may contain 50–100 leaf discs; depending on the size of the cavity, an aboveground nest may contain 1–11 brood cells (MacIvor, ; Sabino & Antonini, ), while the subterranean nests contain a single brood cell (Williams et al., ). The leaf discs are also used to partition the brood cells.…”
Aim: Leafcutter bees use plants as pollen and nectar sources, but also cut leaf discs and use them to line their nests. Which plant species they choose as nesting material and why they do so have remained obscure. We asked the following: (1) How are the plant species used by leafcutter bees distributed phylogenetically? (2) Does plant choice differ across geographical regions, and if so, in what ways? (3) Are the leaf plant species natives or exotics? (4) What plant and leaf traits predict selection of plant species by leafcutter bees? And (5) Does the abundance of individuals per species in the habitat influence leafcutter bees' plant preferences? Location: Tropical South Asia, temperate eastern Canada and US Sonoran Desert Methods: We mapped taxa known to be used by leafcutter bees both from our own study and published literature onto the most recent angiosperm phylogeny. To determine what plant and leaf traits predict leaf selection, we monitored 6,120 individuals of 214 native and exotic plant species planted in a 3-sq. km. arboretum in Arizona and recorded leaf damage inflicted by bees.Results: Megachile showed a strong preference for species in the rosid clade, particularly the phylogenetic cluster of Fabales, Fagales and Rosales. Thirty-two to forty-five percentage of the leaf plant species were exotic to a given region. Membership in the rosid clade and Fabaceae family predicted plant preference, whereas the plant species' local abundance and geographical origin did not. Leaf water content, morphotype and the presence of latex were important factors influencing plant choice, whereas leaf shape and size did not.
Main conclusion:These patterns point to plant groups whose availability should be monitored to assure persistence of leafcutter bees. Their preference for specific globally distributed plant clades, yet ability to readily adopt certain exotic plant species as nest resources, likely augments their ability to persist.
K E Y W O R D Santimicrobial, biogeography, distribution, diversity, evolution, herbivory, leafcutter bee, Megachile, Megachilidae, pollinator, urban ecosystem
“…Despite its high richness and wide distribution, only a few studies have reported the nesting biology of species from this subgenus (Ihering, 1904;Laroca, 1991;Teixeira et al, 2011;Cardoso & Silveira, 2012;Sabino & Antonini, 2017). Here we provide notes on a nest of Megachile (Moureapis) apicipennis Schrottky (Megachilidae) built in an abandoned nest of Xylocopa frontalis (Olivier) (Apidae).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(Laroca, 1991;Teixeira et al, 2011;Cardoso & Silveira, 2012;Sabino & Antonini, 2017) except for Ihering (1904). According to this author, the brood cell walls of a M. apicipennis nest were constructed with mud rather than with pieces of leaves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of leaves of leguminous species (Fabaceae) to construct brood cells was also recorded in another M. (Moureapis) species. Sabino and Antonini (2017) identified leaves of Senna pendula (Willd.) H.S.Irwin and Barneby and Dalbergia miscolobium Benth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only host record for Brachymeria paraguayensis was provided by Noyes (2003) for an unidentified Megachile species. The generalist parasitoid Melittobia australica has been recorded as a natural enemy of several bee species, including five in the genus Megachile, as M. Maculata (Sabino & Antonini, 2017), as well as flies (Calliphoridae, Sarcophagidae) and species of Crabronidae, Formicidae, Pompilidae, Sphecidae, and Vespidae (Noyes, 2003). Species of Coelioxys Latreille and Melittobia Westwood were also reported parasitizing brood cells of other M. (Moureapis) species (Teixeira et al, 2011;Cardoso & Silveira, 2012;Sabino & Antonini, 2017).…”
Notes on a nest of the leafcutting bee Megachile (Moureapis) apicipennis Schrottky (Megachilidae) found in an abandoned gallery excavated by the carpenter bee Xylocopa frontalis (Olivier) (Apidae) are presented. A total of four nests were found at the end of the gallery. Brood cells were lined with imbricate pieces of leaves of Centrosema virginianum (L.) Benth. (Fabaceae). Four males and two females of M. apicipennis emerged as well as individuals of three species of natural enemies: Coelioxys otomita Cresson (Megachilidae), Brachymeria paraguayensis (Brèthes) and Melittobia australica Girault (Eulophidae). Our results were similar to the data obtained from other species of Megachile (Moureapis) Raw.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.