1985
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(85)90006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nerve impulse propagation along central and peripheral fast conducting motor and sensory pathways in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface ratio (SR) was the area of the MEP expressed as a percentage of the surface area of the CMAP [32]. The central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated using the F-wave latency and the following formula: CMCT = Cortical MEP latency -(F-wave latency + CMAP distal Latency -1)/2 [33]. The findings previously obtained on 36 healthy control subjects in a similar age range to that of the present patients were used to define local normative MEP values [23].…”
Section: Motor Evoked Potential Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface ratio (SR) was the area of the MEP expressed as a percentage of the surface area of the CMAP [32]. The central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated using the F-wave latency and the following formula: CMCT = Cortical MEP latency -(F-wave latency + CMAP distal Latency -1)/2 [33]. The findings previously obtained on 36 healthy control subjects in a similar age range to that of the present patients were used to define local normative MEP values [23].…”
Section: Motor Evoked Potential Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the 'central conduction time' from brain to Vpinal cord, the peripheral conduction delay was measured by using the same stimulator to activate spinal motoneurones (or the proximal portions of their axons) at segmental levels (Rossini, Stefano & Stanzione, 1985;Snooks & Swash, 1985;Mills & Murray, 1986). The cathode was positioned over the spinous process of the fourth cervical vertebra with the anode on the inion.…”
Section: Stimulus and Recording Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we recommend applying motor-root stimulation (Rossini et al, 1985;Ugawa et al, 1989;Vucic et al, 2006;Matsumoto et al, 2010Matsumoto et al, , 2013; for a current review, see Rossini et al, 2015). TST is an ''indirect'' method to detect conduction block, while motor-root stimulation is a ''direct'' method, capable of revealing conduction block between Erb's point and spinal nerves at the level of the neural foramina.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…TST is an ''indirect'' method to detect conduction block, while motor-root stimulation is a ''direct'' method, capable of revealing conduction block between Erb's point and spinal nerves at the level of the neural foramina. Currently, there are three methods of motor-root stimulation: electrical stimulation using a high-voltage electrical stimulator (Rossini et al, 1985;Ugawa et al, 1989), electrical stimulation using needle electrodes (Vucic et al, 2006) and magnetic stimulation (Ugawa et al, 1989;Matsumoto et al, 2010Matsumoto et al, , 2013. Each of these three types of motor-root stimulation is technically easier than TST.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%