1957
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401360209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nerve destruction by colchicine in mice and golden hamsters

Abstract: EIGHT FIQURESThe vast growth of literature on the mitotic effects of colchicine (Eigsti and Dustin, '47, '49, '55) overshadows a number of interesting writings, often incidental to other studies, revealing that the drug exerts profound effects upon the nervous system. And buried here and there one can find allusions, albeit scant, to observable morphological changes in nervous tissues following colchicine treatment. Recently, studying effects of the drug on limb regeneration in salamanders, Singer, Flinker, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
1

Year Published

1969
1969
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Colchicine also apparently binds to components of plasma and nuclear membranes as well as to free tubulin (29)(30)(31). Although some studies using doses of colchicine similar to those of the present study report only reversible effects (22,32), several other papers suggest lasting morphological changes in neurons and glia (23,(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Colchicine also apparently binds to components of plasma and nuclear membranes as well as to free tubulin (29)(30)(31). Although some studies using doses of colchicine similar to those of the present study report only reversible effects (22,32), several other papers suggest lasting morphological changes in neurons and glia (23,(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The apparent degeneration of some neurones several weeks after local application of colchicine is puzzling. Although injection of the drug into peripheral nerves or chronic application can cause pronounced Wallerian degeneration (Angevine, 1957;Albuquerque et al 1972; see also Singer & Steinberg, 1972), there was little physiological or anatomical evidence of this occurring during the first week after drug treatment in the present experiments. The percentage of neurones antidromically driven by the treated branch was only marginally reduced compared to normal ganglia, and axons at, or distal to, the site of colchicine application did not show frank signs of degeneration in electron microscopical sections during this period.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The animals tolerated this procedure well and, although three animals died in the immediate post-operative period, those that survived appeared normal and did not show signs of colchicine intoxication (Angevine, 1957). After an interval of 4-7 days (or longer in some animals), the ganglia were removed with suitable lengths of the 6-2 cervical sympathetic trunk, and the inferior and superior post-ganglionic branches, for stimulation and recording with glass suction electrodes (Purves, 1975).…”
Section: Effects Of Colchjcine On Neurones Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, on the other hand, the fast and slow transport are driven by distinct mechanisms, then the microtubule is not the only structure affected by colchicine, and which mechanism is mediated by the microtubules cannot be unambiguously decided. I n all of these experiments the simplistic interpretation of the colchicine effects may be questioned since the drug shows a powerful cytotoxicity (Angevine, 1957)-although our treated crayfish showed no evidence of impaired neural function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%