2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43808-5_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NERosetta for the Named Entity Multi-lingual Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Markers can be used within regular expressions, for some simpler queries over the corpus or for producing queries by constructing automata with more complex requirements. An example of the research in which markers were successfully used for IE is the system for named entity recognition NERosetta (names of institutions, personal names, streets and so forth) (Krstev et al, 2013). The use of markers is possible for text processing purposes to extract domain terminology, measuring units, creating relations between words and so on.…”
Section: Managing Mining Project Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markers can be used within regular expressions, for some simpler queries over the corpus or for producing queries by constructing automata with more complex requirements. An example of the research in which markers were successfully used for IE is the system for named entity recognition NERosetta (names of institutions, personal names, streets and so forth) (Krstev et al, 2013). The use of markers is possible for text processing purposes to extract domain terminology, measuring units, creating relations between words and so on.…”
Section: Managing Mining Project Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another set of algorithms addresses the problem of fully automated (without human validation) large-scale entity extraction. These algorithms target multiple types of entities and have been deployed in several domains (Li et al , 2020), including bioinformatics (Spasić et al , 2013), social media (Lu et al , 2018), local grammar (Krstev et al , 2014) and languages (Krstev et al , 2013; Rehm and Uszkoreit, 2012). The large number of entities recognized from each document makes it impractical to involve authors in the validation of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%