2012
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v4n6p120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NERICA Cultivation and its Yield Determinants: The Case of Upland Rice Farmers in Namulonge, Central Uganda

Abstract:

This paper examined actual farmers’ cultivation practices of NERICA (New Rice for Africa) and the determinants of its yield, based on data obtained from a field survey conducted in central Uganda. NERICA’s high yielding potential was realized in farmers’ fields. On average, farmers attained yield as high as 3 t ha-1. A high seeding rate, high fertilizer/chemical applications and high laborintensity characterized the upland NERICA cultivation in the study area. The estimation of yield function rev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly 70% of farmers in the sample were small farmers with total cultivated area of less than 2 ha. These household characteristics are quite comparable to the characteristics of rice farmers reported by earlier studies conducted in various parts of Uganda [10] [20]- [22].…”
Section: Rainfed Rice Cultivation In Ugandasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Nearly 70% of farmers in the sample were small farmers with total cultivated area of less than 2 ha. These household characteristics are quite comparable to the characteristics of rice farmers reported by earlier studies conducted in various parts of Uganda [10] [20]- [22].…”
Section: Rainfed Rice Cultivation In Ugandasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This was attributed to the fact that upland farmers applied relatively lower seed-rate (92 kg ha -1 ) than recommended average under broadcast method. The response from seed in this study is fairly higher than 0.01t for rainfed farmers elsewhere in the country (Asiimwe, 2009;Haneishi et al, 2013;Miyamoto et al, 2012). Positive response of output to seed (0.3t) has also been reported in West African region (Ajetomobi, 2009).…”
Section: Production Frontiersupporting
confidence: 48%
“…As a result, interpreting low trends in yield and identifying potential policy responses has proved difficult due to unclear understanding of factors affecting its production (GoU, 2009). Firstly, biotic and abiotic factors have been reported as causes of low production (GoU, 2009;Kijima, 2012;Miyamoto et al, 2012;NEWEST, 2012;Odogola, 2006;UBOS, 2010). Secondly, rice production is dominated by rain-fed cultivation the fact that makes it highly sensitive to climate variability (Caffrey et al, 2013;Rowhani et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative to this treatment, the needed labor intensity for other treatments were measured as follows: 1.1 for 22 hills/m 2 (30 cm), 1.2 for 13 hills/m 2 (50 cm), and 1.5 for 33 hills/m 2 (20 cm) and 11 hills/m 2 (60 cm). The labor requirement for weeding per ha for the 17 hills/m 2 (40 cm) treatment was assumed to be 65 person-days/ha, referring to Miyamoto et al (2012). The farm-gate prices of seeds and paddy rice were assumed to be Ush 2000/kg and Ush 1000/kg, respectively, and the wage rate was assumed to be Ush 8000/day, referring to Haneishi et al (2013).…”
Section: Economic Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%