2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05805.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nephron‐sparing surgery for renal tumours using selective renal parenchymal clamping

Abstract: RESULTSThe mean (range) operative duration was 190 (120-300) min. Only one patient needed a blood transfusion. There were no complications in 13 patients after NSS. The mean (range) hospital stay was 5 (3-12) days. The pathological examination detected malignant tumours in 13 patients, and a microscopic examination showed adequate surgical margins in all. The mean (range) follow-up was 24.5 (4-60) months. No patients required haemodialysis immediately after surgery or later. CONCLUSIONSSelective renal parenchy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given to its good oncological results, in our days PN has become a feasible technique comparable to RN in cancer control, even in cases of renal tumors of 4 cm or larger [8]. The goal of PN is to excise the diseased renal segment without injuring the remaining renal tissue; however, this procedure often involves renal artery occlusion with postoperative ischemic acute renal failure occurring in up to 14% of cases [9] and in up to 20% of patients with a solitary kidney [6,10]. Even more, clamping and unclamping renal artery should be avoided given that it may carry the risk of reperfusion injury [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given to its good oncological results, in our days PN has become a feasible technique comparable to RN in cancer control, even in cases of renal tumors of 4 cm or larger [8]. The goal of PN is to excise the diseased renal segment without injuring the remaining renal tissue; however, this procedure often involves renal artery occlusion with postoperative ischemic acute renal failure occurring in up to 14% of cases [9] and in up to 20% of patients with a solitary kidney [6,10]. Even more, clamping and unclamping renal artery should be avoided given that it may carry the risk of reperfusion injury [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, renal-pedicle clamping can lead to ischemia, reperfusion injury and temporal or definite loss of renal function requiring dialysis [4,6,7]. Recently, a technical modification using selective parenchymal clamping has been described [6,7], which allows removing renal tumors without clamping renal pedicle, therefore, avoiding ischemia in the remaining renal tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-made clamp with two remodelled malleable retractors 4 and use of Rumel tourniquet have also been reported. 9 More recently open 10 and laparoscopic Satinsky vascular clamps 11 have been used. A Nussbaum clamp was used by Simon et al in 2008 12 in open partial nephrectomy, normally intended for intestinal clamping during general surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Renal cooling with ice was also unnecessary and further reduced the overall operating time. The lower estimated blood loss could be explained by the avoidance of HC, as vascular injury during HC can lead to profuse bleeding 10 or even renal artery dissection.…”
Section: Surgical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent human reports suggest that a clamping of the renal parenchyma without hilar clamping is feasible for hemostasis during LPN and open PN [37][38][39][40][41]. A clamp may be used on the parenchyma without dissection of the renal hilum.…”
Section: Parenchymal Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%