2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.103085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neotaphonomic study of two Tyto alba assemblages from Botswana: Palaeoecological implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum percentage of fragmentation was obtained for bat radius (34%), the most elongated bone, which is more sensitive to breakage. These observations are in keeping with data on Tyto alba, which are known to present a low fragmentation of skulls and post-cranial elements and a high preservation rate of intact bones (e.g., [14,15,36,37]).…”
Section: Fragmentationsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum percentage of fragmentation was obtained for bat radius (34%), the most elongated bone, which is more sensitive to breakage. These observations are in keeping with data on Tyto alba, which are known to present a low fragmentation of skulls and post-cranial elements and a high preservation rate of intact bones (e.g., [14,15,36,37]).…”
Section: Fragmentationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Our results are difficult to compare directly with other taphonomic analyses of Barn Owl pellet assemblages (Tyto alba) in varied geographical areas, which generally consider more element categories for the anatomical representation, and only for small mammals (e.g., [14,15,36,37]). However, it is interesting to note that most of them show a good preservation of "robust" bones, like mandibles, humeri, femora and tibiae, which are the elements we chose to consider and for which we observed a similar representation in small mammals.…”
Section: Anatomical Representationmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In archeological and paleontological context, fossils are not always identifiable at the species level using traditional morphological characters. For instance, the smallest species of rodents such as Mus, Dendromus or Graphiurus species can be hard to identify due to higher fragmentation rate in sediments and the lack of patent specific dental or cranial characters (Linchamps et al, 2021). The task is even more complicated for remote periods for which few comparative specimens are available.…”
Section: Paleoclimate Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generate impressive numbers of skeletal elements and data on identified taxa, representation, fragmentation and digestion, as well as associated pictures (e.g. Andrews 1990;Souttou et al 2012;Lloveras et al 2014;Fernandez-Jalvo et al 2016;Campmas et al 2018;Fernandez and Montalvo 2017;Montalvo and Fernández 2019;Lebreton et al 2020;Linchamps et al 2021), which are generally not entered into official institutions collections, while all the samples and results of these studies constitute original reference material and improve future possibilities of taphonomic work. Second, neotaphonomic vertebrate collections may result from experiments on bones, which involve the use of datasets and precise protocols.…”
Section: What Is a Vertebrate Neotaphonomic Collection?mentioning
confidence: 99%