1991
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7292(91)90798-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neosalpingostomy for distal tubal obstruction: Prognostic factors and impact of surgical technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pelvic adhesions did not impact the probability of recurrence in our study. These findings are consistent with several previous studies [14][15][16][17] but contrast with those of others [11,12,13,18]. Whereas the type of surgical procedure was not associated with recurrence of hydrosalpinx (laparoscopy versus laparotomy), presence of rugae on preoperative HSG significantly decreased the odds of recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Pelvic adhesions did not impact the probability of recurrence in our study. These findings are consistent with several previous studies [14][15][16][17] but contrast with those of others [11,12,13,18]. Whereas the type of surgical procedure was not associated with recurrence of hydrosalpinx (laparoscopy versus laparotomy), presence of rugae on preoperative HSG significantly decreased the odds of recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, there is still a significant pool of patients with restenosis occurring after traditional reconstruction procedures of Fallopian tubes. Admittedly, damage to the distal tubes is the leading cause for infertility in this group, which on rare occasions can be corrected by fimbrioplasty, fimbriolysis or neosalpingostomy [18]. Repeat microsurgical reconstruction of the proximal tube vies with transcervical tubal recanalization for the management of proximal or mid-tubal reocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for either procedure, the status of the distal tubes is of paramount importance. In the presence of minimal disease of the distal tubes, pregnancy rates of up to 80 % can be attained after correction of proximal tube reocclusion by microsurgical neosalpingostomy, while the rate drops to 16 % in the presence of severe disease of the distal tubes [18]. A distal tube diameter of greater than 2.5 cm and absence of rugae herald severe damage and hence dismal results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High pregnancy rates of about 60% with EP rates of 6% have been reported in cases of the absence of peritoneal damage of serosa after the surgical procedure and a complete removal of adhesions with a good anatomical reconstruction of ovaries and fallopian tubes. EP rates increased up to 20% if at least one of these criteria was not fulfilled (Posaci et al, 1999;Lundroff et al, 1991) or if the tubal damage was severe (Lok et al, 2003;Boer-Meisel et al, 1986;Schlaff et al, 1990). For this reason, patients with dense adhesions and a severe tubal pathology are best referred to IVF.…”
Section: Peritubal Adhesiolysismentioning
confidence: 99%