2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25029-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoproterozoic Intracratonic Basins in Peninsular India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B; Chakrabarti et al, 2007;Chakraborty, 2006;Ramakrishnan and Vaidyanadhan, 2010). The Bundelkhand massif divides the Vindhyan Basin into the Son Valley sector and the Chambal Valley sector or the Rajasthan sector (Kumar, 2012;Valdiya, 2016). It has been suggested that siliciclastic rocks exposed in both these sectors received sediments from different sources (Chakrabarti et al, 2007).…”
Section: 1the Vindhyan Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B; Chakrabarti et al, 2007;Chakraborty, 2006;Ramakrishnan and Vaidyanadhan, 2010). The Bundelkhand massif divides the Vindhyan Basin into the Son Valley sector and the Chambal Valley sector or the Rajasthan sector (Kumar, 2012;Valdiya, 2016). It has been suggested that siliciclastic rocks exposed in both these sectors received sediments from different sources (Chakrabarti et al, 2007).…”
Section: 1the Vindhyan Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B, 2). The presence of a pronounced regional unconformity at the base of the Kaimur Group divides the succession into the Lower Vindhyan and the Upper Vindhyan (Kale et al, 2016;Kumar, 2012;Valdiya, 2016). The Semri Group forms the lower part of the Vindhyan Supergroup, which comprises five formations in the Son Valley sector i.e., Deoland, Kajrahat, Porcellanite (Deonar Formation), Kheinjua, and Rohtas, in order of superposition (Fig.…”
Section: 1the Vindhyan Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%