2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoprene–concrete friction relationships for seismic assessment of existing precast buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This outcome justifies the use of friction connections in existing structures. Vice versa, if the experimental coefficients proposed by Magliulo et al (2011) are considered (c = 0.13 ÷ 0.09), the capacity decreases and, in 25% cases, it can be exceeded by the shear demand. It can be concluded that an unrealistic high friction coefficient for the evaluation of the shear capacity of the connections in the past Italian codes allowed the use of friction connections.…”
Section: Considerations Concerning Use Of Friction Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This outcome justifies the use of friction connections in existing structures. Vice versa, if the experimental coefficients proposed by Magliulo et al (2011) are considered (c = 0.13 ÷ 0.09), the capacity decreases and, in 25% cases, it can be exceeded by the shear demand. It can be concluded that an unrealistic high friction coefficient for the evaluation of the shear capacity of the connections in the past Italian codes allowed the use of friction connections.…”
Section: Considerations Concerning Use Of Friction Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the experimental studies conducted by Magliulo et al (2011) on neopreneto-concrete connections, the friction coefficient varies in the range 0.09 ÷ 0.13 for compressive stress varying between 1.7 MPa and 5.3 MPa. In Figure 16a these limits are compared to the recorded spectral ordinates.…”
Section: Seismic Action and Considerations Concerning Damage Due To Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue curve in Fig. 9 includes both the shear 19 strength of the retrofitting connection systems, placed on both the East and the West sides of the 20 tested specimen, and the concrete-to-neoprene friction forces, depending on both the contact surface 21 features and the acting vertical loads (Magliulo et al 2011). 22 The negative values of forces and displacements correspond to pulling loads, i.e.…”
Section: Experimental Results 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the following years the same authors experimentally defined the frictional strength for 10 the typical existing frictional connections (neoprene-concrete) (Magliulo et al 2011) and they found 11 out that the frictional coefficient values were lower than the values adopted in the previous study, 12…”
Section: Introduction 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies were conducted in the past on nonstructural components performance evaluation, particularly referring to suspended ceiling systems [5][6][7] and plasterboard partitions [8][9][10][11]. Very limited studies were conducted in the past on the seismic behaviour of hollow brick internal partitions, even though they are very common in the European area both in residential and industrial buildings [12,13]. Furthermore, recent earthquakes demonstrated that brick partitions usually exhibit extensive damage jeopardizing the functionality of the whole building (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%