2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonates with congenital Cytomegalovirus and hearing loss identified via the universal newborn hearing screening program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
35
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though the sensitivity of DBS testing can be highly variable since it is strongly affected by the blood component release from ‘Guthrie’ Card and by the nucleic acid extraction methodology applied for [1215], the outcomes of the present study are in agreement with the literature: cCMV infection was identified in 6.1% of children, similarly to other reports in which the rate of cCMV in children failing NHSP ranged between 5 and 8% [3, 4, 12]. The workflow of an hearing-targeted cCMV screenings can also been realized by CMV PCR testing on saliva and/or urine [3]; however, in this setting, we absolutely needed to have the results of audiological examination (TEOAE and ABR) before children were 21 days old days and prior the hospital discharge of the children in order to collect saliva and urine that - unlike in the case of DBS - are not routinely sampling at birth [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Even though the sensitivity of DBS testing can be highly variable since it is strongly affected by the blood component release from ‘Guthrie’ Card and by the nucleic acid extraction methodology applied for [1215], the outcomes of the present study are in agreement with the literature: cCMV infection was identified in 6.1% of children, similarly to other reports in which the rate of cCMV in children failing NHSP ranged between 5 and 8% [3, 4, 12]. The workflow of an hearing-targeted cCMV screenings can also been realized by CMV PCR testing on saliva and/or urine [3]; however, in this setting, we absolutely needed to have the results of audiological examination (TEOAE and ABR) before children were 21 days old days and prior the hospital discharge of the children in order to collect saliva and urine that - unlike in the case of DBS - are not routinely sampling at birth [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It would also enable an earlier identification and correction of the main cause of hearing loss with post-natal onset [5]. If, for any reason, a neonatal cCMV screening is not feasible on a large scale, at least a hearing-targeted cCMV screening should be set up: it would allow the early identification of children with cCMV-related hearing loss, although it would miss delayed hearing losses or other cCMV-related disease [3, 4, 9]. The following benefits from hearing-targeted CMV screening can be underlined; i) it would provide an accurate assessment of the aetiology of childhood deafness, helping physicians in children’s management and follow-up; ii) it would allow an adequate counselling and support to parents; iii) it would help predicting whether another child might be born with hearing-linked damages and, finally, iv) it could alert clinicians on the possible neurological and behavioural complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations