2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00043-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal sepsis and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries from a facility-based birth cohort: an international multisite prospective observational study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
58
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further details of the study design and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mothers and neonates are described elsewhere 41 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further details of the study design and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mothers and neonates are described elsewhere 41 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details of the study design and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of mothers and neonates are described elsewhere 41 According to the established protocol, rectal samples were to be taken from all mothers on recruitment and from neonates aged ≥7 d up to 60 d with clinically suspected sepsis. However, during the course of the present study, rectal samples were taken from neonates with clinically suspected sepsis from 0 d of life onward and these samples were also characterized and included in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Burden of Antibiotic Resistance in Neonates from Developing Societies (BARNARDS) Study conducted an international prospective observational cohort study across 12 clinical sites that highlighted the burden and high mortality of neonatal sepsis among facility-born neonates in low-income and middle-income countries ( 44 ). Based on data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, similar results were obtained ( 45 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of isolates in our meta-analyses from HIC (11 653) was less than for LMIC (14 588) but from half the number of studies (55 vs 90) because LMIC studies were more likely to be single-site and retrospective rather than based on multisite surveillance. Of note here are initiatives such as the Burden of Antibiotic Resistance in Neonates from Developing Societies (BARNARDS) network, which uses a standardised methodological framework to characterise Gram-negative species causing neonatal sepsis in sub-Saharan African and South Asian countries, including genotyping to identify sequence types and AMR genes 6 53 54. That multisite studies in LMICs reported a lower percentage of Gram-negatives relative to single site LMIC studies may reflect better standardisation of microbiological techniques in multisite studies that allowed for improved detection of Gram-positive organisms such as GBS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%