2007
DOI: 10.1515/jpm.2007.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal outcomes in triplet pregnancies: assisted reproduction versus spontaneous conception

Abstract: This study is unable to assess the influence of assisted reproduction on the neonatal outcomes of triplet pregnancies. However, the results suggest that the incidence of major neonatal morbidity, especially malformations, might increase due to assisted reproduction. This finding requires further confirmation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
9
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
9
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with other Italian research [18], all triplet pregnancies in our study population ended preterm. The optimal gestational age at birth for triplet pregnancies is reported to be 34-35 weeks, at a weight of 1,900-2,200 g [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In accordance with other Italian research [18], all triplet pregnancies in our study population ended preterm. The optimal gestational age at birth for triplet pregnancies is reported to be 34-35 weeks, at a weight of 1,900-2,200 g [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To our knowledge, our sample size is larger than other triplet studies in the literature. [2][3][4]8,9 The contemporary time frame of our study is vital because the field of obstetrics is very dynamic. Various clinical observations that may affect practice patterns are probably more relevant with the most recent data available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12] However, only limited data exists for perinatal outcomes when comparing mode of conception for triplet pregnancies. 4,7,13 The purpose of this study is to evaluate neonatal outcomes in triplets conceived spontaneously versus via ART utilizing a large dataset.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%