1980
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198005000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal nasotracheal intubation: An evaluation

Abstract: A retrospective review of 100 surviving infants, all requiring nasotracheal intubation in the neonatal period for greater than 24 hr. was performed to assess the morbidity of this form of airway management. Seventy infants needed only one intubation, 22 were intubated twice and 8 infants required 3 intubations. No infant had evidence of laryngeal or tracheal sequelae, either in the immediate newborn period or on follow‐up. Nasotracheal intubation by an experienced practitioner with appropriate tube fixation an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological analyses of the lesions produced by intubation have been made with accuracy both quantitatively and qualitatively (Burns et al 1970, Hilding 1971, Loeser et al 1978. The respiratory function of the larynx and trachea is the sole physiological activity to have undergone similar scrutiny following intubation (Stewart et al 1980, Strong & Passy 1977.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological analyses of the lesions produced by intubation have been made with accuracy both quantitatively and qualitatively (Burns et al 1970, Hilding 1971, Loeser et al 1978. The respiratory function of the larynx and trachea is the sole physiological activity to have undergone similar scrutiny following intubation (Stewart et al 1980, Strong & Passy 1977.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stewart et a1. 3 reported that neonatal nasal intuba.tion is certainly superior with respect to the stability of the endotracheal tube, though our neonatologists still prefer the oral route possibly because they are anxious about infection to nasal septum and eustachian tube when respiratory support is required for a long time. Furthermore some institutions insisted orotracheal intubation is a safe method of maintaining prolonged tracheal intubation in premature and term newborn infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%