2005
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.048488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neonatal disease severity scoring systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
175
1
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
175
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, we did not utilize severity scoring because many of these systems (eg, newborn respiratory distress scoring system, clinical risk index for babies, and score for neonatal acute physiology) were developed to evaluate the initial risk at time of admission and are limited to the first hours and days of life. 22,23 Since all patients in our neonatal ICU are postnatally transferred (sometimes days or weeks following birth), we do not utilize these scoring systems. For these reasons, we chose not to include them in our paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Last, we did not utilize severity scoring because many of these systems (eg, newborn respiratory distress scoring system, clinical risk index for babies, and score for neonatal acute physiology) were developed to evaluate the initial risk at time of admission and are limited to the first hours and days of life. 22,23 Since all patients in our neonatal ICU are postnatally transferred (sometimes days or weeks following birth), we do not utilize these scoring systems. For these reasons, we chose not to include them in our paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of scoring systems is mandatory in order to effectively compare performances between neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), in regard to variations in mortality and morbidity between different NICUs. (1,2) The Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) score is a risk-adjustment instrument widely used in NICUs. (3) It was developed more than twenty years ago and is based upon six variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, various studies (Dorling, Field, & Manktelow, 2005;Pasman, Rotteveel, Maassen, de Graaf, & Kollée, 1998;Spittle et al, 2014;Zaramella et al, 2008) have indicated that the PERI is useful for assessing a child's risk through their subsequent development and for rapidly and reliably predicting the child's future development. The current study found a negative correlation between the PERI and the development of visual-perceptive abilities at four and five years of age, which might influence the process of learning to read, an important skill for academic performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%