Neoliberalism Within Psychology Higher Education in Indonesia: A Critical Analysis

Abstract

Critical scholars have demonstrated the ways in which neoliberalism has increasingly become a dominant organising principle in current global political, economic, and social practices, including in higher education. This article aims to explore how and to what extent neo-liberal discourses have operated in a specific context, namely, in psychology higher education in Indonesia. To this end, the author examined policy documents published by relevant authorities such as AP2TPI, Dirjen DIKTI, and BAN-PT; and reflect on how those policies were enacted in the author’s 10-year experience as a psychology lecturer in a university in Indonesia. The results show that neoliberal discourses such as standardisation, competitiveness, and market orientation have underpinned the policies, curricula, and practices of psychology higher education in Indonesia. The author argues that such discourses (re)produce psychology students, graduates, and lecturers who are competitive, result-oriented, and market-driven. Consequently, democratic, humane, and organic ways of learning and practicing psychology have given way to more mechanistic, standardised, and box-ticking approaches to human behaviour.

Voices of English education department teachers on traces of neoliberal ideology in the ‘Kampus Merdeka’ concept

“…For example, there is an influence of the neoliberalism in good university government [5]. Several researchers have investigated the implication of neoliberal ideology on the lecturers' [6], while the neoliberalism within the field of psychology has been done in Indonesian higher education [7].…”

Neoliberalisme Dan Dampaknya Bagi Pendidikan Indonesia: Sebuah Refleksi

“…Neoliberalisme telah berdampak secara signifikan terhadap pendidikan di Indonesia, yang mengarah pada korporatisasi sekolah-sekolah pendidikan, kompetisi antar sekolah, dan erosi misi kewarganegaraan sekolah (Mulya, 2016;Rosser, 2016). Hal ini membuat kondisi akademis menjadi lebih tidak stabil dan genting bagi para akademisi, dengan pendapatan yang rendah dan tidak ada jaminan untuk masa kerja (Mula-Falcón dan Caballero, 2022).…”

Transforming to a Democratic Islamic University: An Application of Futuristic Approaches

“…One of the conflict factors is that there is a discrepancy in the perception of the university's fundamental educational purposes between the university leaderships, which are largely senior staff, and the collective, which consists of the remaining academic staff and the students. To be the leading international university in Indonesia, the university is forced to reshape their management to be competitive in the Indonesian higher education market, and simultaneously correspond with the highest standards in government audits (Mulya, 2016). Surely, this is by no means the greater adaptation of the university management to neoliberal orientations.…”