“…There is now a growing body of literature suggesting that the developmental state has not retreated but rather adapted to a changing domestic and international environment (e.g., Wan, 2008;Park, 2011;Kim, 2012;Suh and Kwon, 2014;Thurbon, 2016). Given that the developmental state was and remains an underlying institutional system involving governments, bureaucracies and the private sector rather than a collection of policies only, it would have been difficult for the EAFC to terminate it (Hundt, 2015). Most notably, there is a 'developmental mindset' that has survived the EAFC, cutting across both liberal and conservative governments (Thurbon, 2016).…”