Neoliberalism — Is This the End?

Dobos, Ned

doi:10.1057/9780230306950_4

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is estimated that several thousand Ukrainians and Serbians obtained Hungarian citizenship and the freedom of movement in the EU without actually fulfilling the requirements. 48 The second criticism holds that the FIDESZ-KDNP coalition followed its own political agenda, as the Hungarian citizens living abroad gain the right to vote for the party list of the Hungarian parliament elections. At the last elections in 2018, 266.000 persons voted without residence in Hungary for the party list (they have no vote in the constituencies), 96% of which voted for the common party list of FIDESZ-KDNP, but this resulted in no additional seat.…”

Section: Vmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…I (1882), Budapest  A. Sajti, Enikő (1984), Székely telepítés és nemzetiségpolitika Bácskában -1941, Budapest  Dobos, Ádám György, Nikoletta Dobos-Balogh (2019), »Állampolgárság-biznisz«, avagy az egyszerűsített honosítási eljárás és az illegális migráció összefüggései, in: Ügyészek Lapja 1, 57-63  Ferenczy, Ferenc (1930), Magyar állampolgársági jog, Gyoma  Kisteleki, Károly (2000), Magyar állampolgárság a XX. században, in: Állam-és Jogtudomány 1-2, 57-77  Körtvélyesi, Zsolt (2011), Az »egységes magyar nemzet« és az állampolgárság, in: Fundamentum 2, 49-55  Lükő, Gábor (1936), A moldvai csángók, Budapest  Parragi, Mária (2000), A magyar állampolgársági jog és a külföldön élő magyarság, in: Kisebbségkutatás 1, 37-50  Sántha, Alajos (1942), Bukovinai magyarok, Kolozsvár 50 ) 50.…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Regulation of the Citizenship of Ethnic Hungarians Living Abroad: Ethnopolitics, Demographical Issues and Humanitarian Aspects – Bilateral and Unilateral Solutions

Frey¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Vmentioning

confidence: 99%

unclassified

Regulation of the Citizenship of Ethnic Hungarians Living Abroad: Ethnopolitics, Demographical Issues and Humanitarian Aspects – Bilateral and Unilateral Solutions

Frey¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ethics and the global financial crisis: why incompetence is worse than greed

2015

Choice Reviews Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On 13 September 1970, New York Times Magazine published an op-ed article provocatively entitled 'The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits'. It would turn its author into the most prominent colour guard of shareholder wealth maximization. 1 In this piece, Milton Friedman, six years later awarded the Nobel Prize in economics, inveighed against what he called 'unadulterated socialism'. 2 He believed that 'socialist' tendencies were present among many businesspeople of his time, claiming as they did that business is not only about making profit but also about achieving certain social ends. Friedman provided the 'socialist' businesspeople with an alternative as simple as it was powerful. Business, he said, is about maximizing shareholder wealth, and nothing else.Simple or simplistic? In the writings of Friedman's opponents and many of his followers surely this view has often been reduced to the idea that in business 'anything goes'. Nor has Friedman done too much to allay potential misgivings on this point, as he and his followers have been quite proud to accept being turned into relentless laissez-fairists. The view is much more subtle, though; it is in any case subtle enough to use as a plausible default position about the responsibilities of corporations. To begin with, Friedman does not mean to say that shareholder interests trump everything. Law is a restrictive factor, which has lexicographic priority over the shareholders; no business strategy should be adopted if it clashes with the law, whatever pain the shareholders suffer as a result of opportunity lost. Tax evasion and illegal pollution are prohibited, for instance, despite the obvious negative effects on profit generation. This is true of ethics as well. Even though ethics is mentioned only twice, Friedman is clear enough to stipulate that ethics too has lexicographic priority over the interests of the shareholders. Now Friedman was acutely aware of the fact that ethics and law may differ

show abstract

Neoliberalism — Is This the End?

Cited by 2 publications

References 2 publications

Regulation of the Citizenship of Ethnic Hungarians Living Abroad: Ethnopolitics, Demographical Issues and Humanitarian Aspects – Bilateral and Unilateral Solutions

Regulation of the Citizenship of Ethnic Hungarians Living Abroad: Ethnopolitics, Demographical Issues and Humanitarian Aspects – Bilateral and Unilateral Solutions

Ethics and the global financial crisis: why incompetence is worse than greed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About