Neoliberalism in Australia and the Henry Tax Review

Passant, John

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2431952

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These barriers include political sensitivities (Evans 2011), the influence of powerful lobby groups in defence of the policy status quo (Gurran and Phibbs 2016), and prevailing cultural norms (Blunden 2016;Khoury 2015;Marriott 2010;Passant 2014;Worthington 2012). Their effect is reinforced by the financial relationship between the Australian Government and the states (Eccleston, Woolley et al 2013;Eccleston and Smith 2015;Smith 2012;Warren 2010;, and deeply institutionalised relationships between major political parties and commercial interests which corrode capacity to implement reform proposals (Eccleston and Marsh 2011).…”

Section: 12mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways to housing tax reform

Eccleston¹,

Verdouw²

2018

AHURI Final Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: 12mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways to housing tax reform

Eccleston¹,

Verdouw²

2018

AHURI Final Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Finally, given the considerable political sensitivities associated with housing-related tax policy (Evans 2011), a number of powerful lobby groups advocate in favour of the policy status quo (Gurran and Phibbs 2016) and the prevailing paradigm and cultural norms that structure the discourse of tax reform (Blunden 2016;Khoury 2015;Marriott 2010;Passant 2014;Worthington 2012). These dynamics have historically been reinforced by institutionalised relations between major political parties and commercial interests which corrode institutional capacity to implement reform proposals (Eccleston and Marsh 2011).…”

Section: Intergovernmental Coordinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pathways to state property tax reform

Eccleston¹,

Warren²,

Verdouw³

et al. 2017

AHURI Final Report

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AHURI report 291iii AHURI AHURI is a national independent research network with an expert not-for-profit research management company, AHURI Limited, at its centre.AHURI's mission is to deliver high quality research that influences policy development and practice change to improve the housing and urban environments of all Australians.Using high quality, independent evidence and through active, managed engagement, AHURI works to inform the policies and practices of governments and the housing and urban development industries, and stimulate debate in the broader Australian community.AHURI undertakes evidence-based policy development on a range of priority policy topics that are of interest to our audience groups, including housing and labour markets, urban growth and renewal, planning and infrastructure development, housing supply and affordability, homelessness, economic productivity, and social cohesion and wellbeing. AcknowledgementsThis material was produced with funding from the Australian Government and state and territory governments. AHURI Limited gratefully acknowledges the financial and other support it has received from these governments, without which this work would not have been possible. AHURI Limited also gratefully acknowledges the contributions, both financial and in-kind, of its university research partners who have helped make the completion of this material possible.The authors would like to thank Tim Lawless, Research Director, Asia Pacific, CoreLogic, for providing access to their data. DisclaimerThe opinions in this report reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of AHURI Limited, its Board, its funding organisations or Inquiry panel members. No responsibility is accepted by AHURI Limited, its Board or funders for the accuracy or omission of any statement, opinion, advice or information in this publication. AHURI journalAHURI Final Report journal series is a refereed series presenting the results of original research to a diverse readership of policy-makers, researchers and practitioners. Peer review statementAn objective assessment of reports published in the AHURI journal series by carefully selected experts in the field ensures that material published is of the highest quality. The AHURI journal series employs a double-blind peer review of the full report, where anonymity is strictly observed between authors and referees. Table 11: Summary of currently applied or proposed land tax reform transition models 38 Table 12: Levels of government imposing recurrent property taxation 43 Table 13: Thresholds ($ value and percentage of median property price) required to achieve revenue neutrality at different rates of transfer duty 55 Table 14: 'Break even' points under new regime-percentage of purchasers paying less and maximum property value below which purchasers would pay less 58 List of tables Executive summaryReforming state and local government taxes that apply to property can contribute to creating a fairer and more sustainable housing syste...

show abstract

Neoliberalism in Australia and the Henry Tax Review

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Pathways to housing tax reform

Pathways to housing tax reform

Pathways to state property tax reform

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About