2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoliberalism, consultants and the privatisation of public policy formulation: The case of Britain's rail industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Table 1, the interviewees included: 14 individuals who were board members, at the time of their interview, in at least one public company; 11 consultants (most of them specializing in risk management); five Chief Risk Officers (CROs); two think-tank executives; one recently retired Big Four audit partner; and one principal, in charge of the risk oversight domain within a professional institute (interviewed twice). Consultants were included in the interviewee set because of the extent of their influence on boards and top executives (Jupe & Funnell, 2015;Sturdy, 1997). Most board members we interviewed had experience on audit committees and some of them sat, when it existed, on the board's risk management committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Table 1, the interviewees included: 14 individuals who were board members, at the time of their interview, in at least one public company; 11 consultants (most of them specializing in risk management); five Chief Risk Officers (CROs); two think-tank executives; one recently retired Big Four audit partner; and one principal, in charge of the risk oversight domain within a professional institute (interviewed twice). Consultants were included in the interviewee set because of the extent of their influence on boards and top executives (Jupe & Funnell, 2015;Sturdy, 1997). Most board members we interviewed had experience on audit committees and some of them sat, when it existed, on the board's risk management committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For accounting scholarship in this area, see Cooper et al (), Dillard and Vinnari (), Jupe and Funnell (), Morales et al (), and Morales and Sponem ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another objective is the interoperability aimed at an optimal level of technical harmonization (Panák et al 2017;Nedeliakova and Panák 2015). Liberalization, privatization and globalization of economies have led to high level of competition in railway sectors and that transportation sector is growing at an exponential rate and various regulations and directives are particularly seen in this industry (Jupe and Funnell, 2015;Ozkan et al 2016). One of the most clear objective of EU legislation is to allow third parties access to the network and to make competition a key lever in the revitalization of the sector to support security and interoperability (Crozet, 2016;Kurosaki and Singh, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%