2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2003.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neogene–Quaternary magmatism and geodynamics in the Carpathian–Pannonian region: a synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
234
0
12

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
234
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…9), Koroneos et al (2010) and Cvetković et al (2007b) proposed emplacement during the early stages of extension related to the formation of the Pannonian basin, the Bukulja intrusion being located in the footwall of a major core complex exhumed in early Miocene times (Marović et al 2007). Hence, the location of these S-type granites at the southern margin of the Pannonian basin, their Early Miocene age, and their association with core complex formation all argue for them being located in the backarc area of the W-directed subduction of the European lithosphere beneath the Carpathians, widely invoked to explain extension and magmatism in the main part of the Pannonian basin (Csontos 1995;Seghedi et al 2004). However, the locations of the Miocene S-type granitoids of the Inner Dinarides also come to lie into within the Late Eocene to earliest Miocene ([22 Ma) belt of predominantly I-type granitoids.…”
Section: Discussion Of Data Within the Regional Geodynamic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9), Koroneos et al (2010) and Cvetković et al (2007b) proposed emplacement during the early stages of extension related to the formation of the Pannonian basin, the Bukulja intrusion being located in the footwall of a major core complex exhumed in early Miocene times (Marović et al 2007). Hence, the location of these S-type granites at the southern margin of the Pannonian basin, their Early Miocene age, and their association with core complex formation all argue for them being located in the backarc area of the W-directed subduction of the European lithosphere beneath the Carpathians, widely invoked to explain extension and magmatism in the main part of the Pannonian basin (Csontos 1995;Seghedi et al 2004). However, the locations of the Miocene S-type granitoids of the Inner Dinarides also come to lie into within the Late Eocene to earliest Miocene ([22 Ma) belt of predominantly I-type granitoids.…”
Section: Discussion Of Data Within the Regional Geodynamic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of the Neogene magmatic rocks within the Alpine-CarpathianPannonian-Dinaridic region, on the other hand, is by far more dispersed, many but by no means all of them being related to subduction in the Carpathians and the contemporaneous opening of the Pannonian basin (e.g. Seghedi et al 2004). Only rarely is the Neogene magmatic activity spatially associated with Paleogene precursors, such as in the Pohorje region of Slovenia (Trajanova et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volcanic and/or intrusive activity took place since 21 Ma till 0.1 Ma with a distinct migration in time from west to east ( Figure 2). Volcanic forms show diverse compositions that were generated in response to complex syn-and post-collisional tectonic processes [1,2] involving subduction with roll-back, collision, slab breakoff, delamination, strike-slip tectonics and block rotations of two microplates [4][5][6][7]. Major groups of calc-alkaline rock-types (felsic, intermediate and mafic varieties) have been distinguished and several minor alkalic types also pointed out, including K-alkalic, shoshonitic, ultrapotassic and Na-alkalic.…”
Section: Geotectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviews have been published treating the space/time evolution of volcanic activity [1,2], geotectonic evolution [3] and petrology and geodynamic setting of volcanic activity [4][5][6][7]. That is the reason that these subjects are covered only in the extent necessary for a proper understanding of volcanic form presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studied volcano is situated at the junction between the Codru-Moma and Highiș-Drocea Mts., at the tectonic boundary between the South and North Apuseni tectonic units (see inset Figure 1) [4][5][6]. An extensional regime in the Apuseni area during Middle Miocene time [4,7,8] was responsible for magma generation due to decompression melting of upper lithosphere/lower crust during eastward translation and clockwise rotation of the Intra-Carpathian blocks [1,[9][10][11]. This was probably coupled to asthenosphere upwelling and a higher thermal regime favoring partial melting and mixing processes [1,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%