1991
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)91021-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neodymiumi:yttrium-aluminum garnet laser-assisted pulmonary resections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Keenan et al [14] found that there is no difference between stapled resections and Nd:YAG laser resections of pulmonary nodular or interstitial disease with respect to duration of chest tube placement and hospital stay. Although our data showed statistically significant differences in the mean drainage time between the wedge resection group and the segmentectomy group, the average drainage time in both groups was less than or similar compared to that reported in other studies using the Nd:YAG laser [6,10,14]. However, the laser segmentectomy group had two severe cases of prolonged air leakage that needed post-operative pleurodesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Keenan et al [14] found that there is no difference between stapled resections and Nd:YAG laser resections of pulmonary nodular or interstitial disease with respect to duration of chest tube placement and hospital stay. Although our data showed statistically significant differences in the mean drainage time between the wedge resection group and the segmentectomy group, the average drainage time in both groups was less than or similar compared to that reported in other studies using the Nd:YAG laser [6,10,14]. However, the laser segmentectomy group had two severe cases of prolonged air leakage that needed post-operative pleurodesis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Various devices, including the stapler, electrocautery, and laser, have been used to resect lung parenchyma. However, the use of the stapler technique for limited pulmonary resection is prone to substantial distortion of and mechanical impingement on the remaining bronchopulmonary tissues [6]. In contrast, the advantage of laser resection is that it preserves the healthy lung parenchyma, thus avoiding total volume loss [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,3,4 The routine use of surgical staplers does not result in adequate sealing in the majority of patients, 2,16 which leads to prolonged chest tube drainage time, increasing the patient's risk of pleural infections, pulmonary embolism, respiratory distress, and associated pain, therefore prolonging hospital stay. 3,13 Many procedures, such as the application of fibrin glue, [17][18][19] synthetic sealant, 20,21 and biodegradable sealant 22,23 reinforcement of pulmonary closure with various materials, 24,25 and the use of laser, 26,27 ultrasonic dissection, 28 and autologous blood patch 10 have been proposed to control and prevent air leaks (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%