1992
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)90112-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neocortical localization of tactile/proprioceptive limb placing reactions in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the observation period was extended to 4 weeks (compared with 3 weeks in the contusion model) because the lesion was more severe. Since correct foot placing is associated with correct CST function (De Ryck et al, 1992;Metz and Whishaw, 2002), we also analyzed stepping and correct paw positioning scores for the contusion model (Fig. 1C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the observation period was extended to 4 weeks (compared with 3 weeks in the contusion model) because the lesion was more severe. Since correct foot placing is associated with correct CST function (De Ryck et al, 1992;Metz and Whishaw, 2002), we also analyzed stepping and correct paw positioning scores for the contusion model (Fig. 1C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMS is a ten-point locomotor rating scale (ranging from 9normal locomotion to 0complete hind-limb paralysis), in which mice are scored by two investigators who were unaware of the experimental groups based on hind-limb movements made in an open field during a 4-minute interval. Since correct foot placing correlates with proper CST function (De Ryck et al, 1992;Metz and Whishaw, 2002) and because subscores for each attribute of the BMS can be used to reveal recovery responses for individual locomotor features (Basso et al, 2006), stepping performance and correct paw positioning were evaluated. The scoring of the stepping was performed to emphasize whether plantar stepping was present in less (score of 0) or more (score of 1) than 50% of the steps, provided the animal was moving at least three body lengths at consistent speed.…”
Section: Locomotion Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normal animals rapidly place their forelimb on the table top. Performance was scored between 0 (normal) and 10 (maximal impairment) (18,19). Similarly, the hindlimb-placing test evaluated the animal's ability to place the hindpaw on a table in response to light stimulation and was scored on a 0-6 scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning on the day of surgery and continuing every other day for 2 weeks, animals were examined by using a limb placing test to assess sensorimotor function in the forelimb (10,11). Specifically, the forelimb placing test measures sensorimotor function in each forelimb as the animal places the limb on a tabletop in response to visual, tactile, and proprioceptive stimuli (total score ϭ 0-12; 12 ϭ maximally impaired).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%