2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma

Abstract: Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses over adjuvant treatment 1 ; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Herein, we report results from a randomized phase II study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (NCT02519322). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
453
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 609 publications
(477 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(36 reference statements)
18
453
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Early-stage LUSC patients also revealed immune marker mutation profiles based on their somatic mutational burdens, which may justify a personalized immunotherapeutic approach to target cancers at early stages of disease progression (247). Immunotherapy had been also employed as an intervention in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, the former of which is based on the premise that immunotherapy will enable host immunity's recognition of the tumor-specific antigens (248)(249)(250)(251). In early-stage NSCLC patients, nivolumab administration prior to surgery activated a pathological response in 45% of the tumors studied, which, in turn, increased density of T cell clones in the tumor compartment as well as in the periphery (251).…”
Section: Immuno-adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy In Early Stage Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early-stage LUSC patients also revealed immune marker mutation profiles based on their somatic mutational burdens, which may justify a personalized immunotherapeutic approach to target cancers at early stages of disease progression (247). Immunotherapy had been also employed as an intervention in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, the former of which is based on the premise that immunotherapy will enable host immunity's recognition of the tumor-specific antigens (248)(249)(250)(251). In early-stage NSCLC patients, nivolumab administration prior to surgery activated a pathological response in 45% of the tumors studied, which, in turn, increased density of T cell clones in the tumor compartment as well as in the periphery (251).…”
Section: Immuno-adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy In Early Stage Lungmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has even led to the formation of an International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium which has recently published consensus-based recommendations on neoadjuvant systemic therapy [19]. Treatment approaches with both targeted (BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination) and immunotherapy have been investigated in the neoadjuvant setting [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The treatment duration before surgery typically ranged from 3 to 12 weeks in these trials, frequently followed by a period of adjuvant treatment resulting in a total treatment duration of 1 year.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent data from murine xenograft models of a neoadjuvant treatment setting show promising effects of immunotherapy on survival in the latter yet non-metastatic setting [193]. Checkpoint inhibitor treatment alone exhibited favorable survival rates in neo-adjuvantly treated melanoma, NSCLC, and glioblastoma cohorts [194][195][196]. Potentially, a reservoir of antigen of the primary tumor may be needed for the induction of strong adaptive immune responses which then exerts its effect on distant micro-metastasis once the primary tumor is removed.…”
Section: Anti-pd-1 Compared To Anti-ctla-4 Brain Metastasismentioning
confidence: 99%