2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e16207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.

Abstract: Background: FOLFIRINOX is a standard treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) remains debated. Methods: We performed a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis on neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with BRPC. Studies with BRPC patients who received FOLFIRINOX as first-line neoadjuvant treatment were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
74
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 22 In patient-level meta-analyses for neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, median PFS and OS were 18.0 months and 22.2 months in patients with BRPC, respectively, while median PFS and OS were 15.0 and 24.2 months in patients with LAPC, respectively. 21 , 22 Although our data seems somewhat inferior to the outcomes of these meta-analyses, direct data comparison should be performed with caution due to the heterogeneity that exists even within BRPC and LAPC. This fact is supported by the findings that median PFS and OS ranged from 3.0–20.4 months to 10.0–32.7 months, respectively, among studies included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 20 22 In patient-level meta-analyses for neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, median PFS and OS were 18.0 months and 22.2 months in patients with BRPC, respectively, while median PFS and OS were 15.0 and 24.2 months in patients with LAPC, respectively. 21 , 22 Although our data seems somewhat inferior to the outcomes of these meta-analyses, direct data comparison should be performed with caution due to the heterogeneity that exists even within BRPC and LAPC. This fact is supported by the findings that median PFS and OS ranged from 3.0–20.4 months to 10.0–32.7 months, respectively, among studies included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there was no difference in survival outcomes between BRPC and LAPC, in line with the results of patient-level meta-analysis. 21 This may indicate that tumor biology, rather than anatomic involvement of major vessels, may be important in patients with BRPC or LAPC treated with FOLFIRINOX.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemotherapy is an important part of PDAC treatment [ 45 ]. It may be applied systemically if the cancer has metastasized or may be combined with surgery in a neo-adjuvant or adjuvant setting [ 1 , 46 ]. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine is the first-line treatment against PDAC and is well tolerated with low side effects [ 42 ].…”
Section: Clinical Therapies—an Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of NAC-GS suggests control of subdiagnostic liver metastases before surgery for R-PDAC. A systematic review showed that neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX therapy for BR-PDAC had a favorable median OS, resection rate, and R0 resection rate [60]. The resection rate reached 67.8%, the R0 resection rate was 83.9%, and the median OS ranged from 11.0-34.2 months across studies.…”
Section: Present Neoadjuvant Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%