1998
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of 285 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
190
2
31

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(230 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
190
2
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer as an alternative approach to conventional primary debulking surgery (Chambers et al, 1990;Vergote et al, 1998;Kayikc¸ioglu et al, 2001;Morice et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer as an alternative approach to conventional primary debulking surgery (Chambers et al, 1990;Vergote et al, 1998;Kayikc¸ioglu et al, 2001;Morice et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debulking after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with less operative morbidity and improved rates of optimal cytoreduction. 6,[11][12][13][14][15] Chambers et al 11 in 1990 and Schwartz et al 13 in 1994 compared the outcomes of patients with clinical evidence of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with patients with suboptimally debulked Stage IIIC and Stage IV ovarian carcinoma who were later treated with chemotherapy. They found that the overall survival was the same for both groups of patients but that the patients who received neoadjuvant treatment better tolerated chemotherapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of NAC/IDS on survival and perioperative morbidity varies in these studies (4)(5)(6). According to these studies, patients treated with NAC/IDS had comparable survival with those who underwent PDS (5,(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 98%