2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gynaecological cancers – Implications for staging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The randomized trials can be broadly classified as NACT ± RT or NACT ± surgery. In the first group of trials, the response rate varied from 40 to 80% with b 10% complete response; however, these trials failed to show any improvement in overall or progression-free survival [4]. These results led to the hypothesis that removal of residual disease after NACT by surgery may result in survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The randomized trials can be broadly classified as NACT ± RT or NACT ± surgery. In the first group of trials, the response rate varied from 40 to 80% with b 10% complete response; however, these trials failed to show any improvement in overall or progression-free survival [4]. These results led to the hypothesis that removal of residual disease after NACT by surgery may result in survival benefit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The benefit of addition of chemotherapy on survival decreases with advanced stage (10% for stage Ia-IIa, 7% for stage IIb, and 3% for stage III and IVa) [3]. Residual pelvic disease and locoregional recurrence remain the main causes of treatment failure in such settings [4]. Therefore, newer treatment modalities need to be explored for better tumor control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These two randomized prospective trials showed that in selected patients, interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed equivalent survival with less morbidity compared with primary cytoreductive surgery. NACT followed by IDS may be particularly useful in patients with a poor performance status, significant medical co‐morbidities, visceral metastases, and those who have large pleural effusions and/or gross ascites . In selected patients whose primary cytoreduction is considered suboptimal, particularly if a gynecologic oncologist did not perform the initial operation, interval debulking may be considered after 2–3 cycles of systemic chemotherapy .…”
Section: Primary Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NACT followed by IDS may be particularly useful in patients with a poor performance status, significant medical co-morbidities, visceral metastases, and those who have large pleural effusions and/or gross ascites. 54 In selected patients whose primary cytoreduction is consid- (Table 3). The accepted standard is 6 cycles of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, with a platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel).…”
Section: Interval Debulkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, delay of definitive treatment, i.e. radiation and selection of resistant clone, are potential disadvantages of NACT [11] . Apart from locally advanced disease, the role of NACT has also been explored in patients with early-stage (IB-IIA) disease prior to surgery or radiation.…”
Section: Neo-adjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%