2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in stage IB2 and IIA cervical cancer: A retrospective comparison with chemoirradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the neoadjuvant therapy to surgery is not a standard therapy for FIGO IB-IIA patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery has been evaluated by two randomized phase III clinical trial (NCT00193739 and EORTC Protocol 55994, no results available yet) [6] and it was permitted in National…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the neoadjuvant therapy to surgery is not a standard therapy for FIGO IB-IIA patients, neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery has been evaluated by two randomized phase III clinical trial (NCT00193739 and EORTC Protocol 55994, no results available yet) [6] and it was permitted in National…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary treatment strategy for patients with early-stage cervical cancers, particularly stage IA-IB1, is radical hysterectomy with or without radiation or chemotherapy [2,4]. Multiple treatment regimens have been actively explored and proposed for high-risk early-stage (stage IB-IIA) cervical cancer patients [5,6]. Neoadjuvant brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by radical surgery showed an e cacy non-inferior to standard chemoradiation treatment and a more favorable toxicity pro le in stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3c, d). However, in several retrospective studies, neoadjuvant brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by RS for stage IB2 and IIA cervical cancer patients had no obvious inferiority to NACT + RS [31,32]. Additionally, Vízkeleti et al observed that the postoperative response rate in patients who received preoperative intrauterine brachytherapy was higher than that in patients who received RS alone (P = 0.03), and the rate of positive surgical margins was significantly lower (P = 0.02) [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, this assessment is based mainly on the clinical and pathological characteristics of cervical cancer, such as age, stage, tumor size, histological type and depth of tumor invasion, positive surgical margins, the presence of metastases in the lymph nodes, the presence of parametric and perineural invasion, and some other factors [37][38][39][40]. Despite careful selection, in some patients, adjuvant therapy is not only ineffective but also leads to the development of severe complications [9,10,12,13,[41][42][43][44]. In this regard, the problem of selecting patients with a low risk of disease recurrence, as well as with chemo-and radioresistant tumors, remains relevant and the search for new prognostic and predictive markers of cervical cancer has not lost its significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%