2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab, Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pCR rate ranged from 7% to 31% in most of the previously reported studies with capecitabine and RT, 14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and FOLFOX and radiation therapy and 5-FU and radiation therapy up to a level of 18-25%. [31][32][33][34] The pCR rate in the current study (13.6%) is comparable to those found by Kim 14 The higher figures in these studies in comparison to the present study may be due to a more favorable distribution of the T stage, 22 the use of a radiation boost to the tumor, or the use of leucovorine in addition to capecitabine. 14 These discordant results may be due to differences in staging of the primary tumor; as we know, EUS seems to provide more accurate staging for mobile T1 and T2 lesions, whereas MRI seems to be superior for fixed, more locally advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The pCR rate ranged from 7% to 31% in most of the previously reported studies with capecitabine and RT, 14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] and FOLFOX and radiation therapy and 5-FU and radiation therapy up to a level of 18-25%. [31][32][33][34] The pCR rate in the current study (13.6%) is comparable to those found by Kim 14 The higher figures in these studies in comparison to the present study may be due to a more favorable distribution of the T stage, 22 the use of a radiation boost to the tumor, or the use of leucovorine in addition to capecitabine. 14 These discordant results may be due to differences in staging of the primary tumor; as we know, EUS seems to provide more accurate staging for mobile T1 and T2 lesions, whereas MRI seems to be superior for fixed, more locally advanced disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…À l'inverse, la capécitabine s'est révélée non inférieure au 5-fluoro-uracile en perfusion continue en association avec une radiothérapie concomitante, dans notre étude tout comme dans l'étude de Hofheinz et al [20]. D'autres molécules de chimiothérapie sont également en cours d'étude : l'irinotécan, en association avec le 5-fluoro-uracile [21][22][23], et des thérapies ciblées comme le cétuximab (inhibiteurs du récepteur de l'epidermal growth factor) ou le bévacizumab (dirigé contre le vascular endothelial growth factor) [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] ont donné dans plusieurs études de phase I/II des résultats encourageants en termes de taux de réponse complète histologique et de toxicité.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…All of these studies had the expectation of improving the pathological complete response rate to therapy as a surrogate marker of the improvement in disease and overall survival [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Table 5 shows a summary of studies containing bevacizumab which have been published so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%