2001
DOI: 10.1080/003976701753387950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neo-Latin Studies: Significance and Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…121-123;Ostler 2007, 292-301;Stroh 2007, 228-248. 29 One prominent Neo-Latinist, Hans Helander has described the era of chief interest to his discipline as stretching from c. 1400-c. 1800 (Helander 2001;2004). See, however, IJsewijn 1990 and Eichenseer 1999 for examples of Latinists that would like to stretch the Neo-Latin period right up to the present day.…”
Section: Peroratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…121-123;Ostler 2007, 292-301;Stroh 2007, 228-248. 29 One prominent Neo-Latinist, Hans Helander has described the era of chief interest to his discipline as stretching from c. 1400-c. 1800 (Helander 2001;2004). See, however, IJsewijn 1990 and Eichenseer 1999 for examples of Latinists that would like to stretch the Neo-Latin period right up to the present day.…”
Section: Peroratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is remarkable that many learned scholars today are not aware of the existence of this huge treasury. (Helander 2001, 8-9, repeated in Helander 2004 In the latter half of the eighteenth century, French seemed poised to take over the entire World of Learning and become the "new Latin". English has by and large accomplished that feat today.…”
Section: Peroratiomentioning
confidence: 99%