Nematicide Effect of Various Organic Soil Amendments on Meloidogyne ethiopica Whitehead, 1968, on Potted Vine Plants

Rivera, Lucia; Aballay, Erwin

doi:10.4067/s0718-58392008000300009

Cited by 22 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A wide range of options was considered: amendments, biofumigations, crop rotation, grafting, green manures, mycorrhization, resistant cultivars HELMINTHOLOGIA, 49, 4: 259 -269, 2012 Nematicidal and fertilizing effects of chicken manure, fresh and composted olive mill wastes on organic melon (Gamliel et al, 2000;Sasanelli et al, 2002;Nico et al, 2004;Castillo et al, 2006;D'Addabbo et al, 2011;Renčo et al, 2007;, soil solarization, ozone and steam applications (Sasanelli & Greco, 2000;Tamietti & Valentino, 2000;Tjamos et al, 2000;, biocidal plants or natural byproducts (Gommers, 1981;Grainge & Ahmed, 1988;Sasanelli & D'Addabbo, 1993;Sasanelli et al, 2007Sasanelli et al, , 2009Maistrello et al, 2010;Renčo et al, 2012) and biological control agents especially fungi and bacteria (Vannacci & Gullino, 2000;. Soil amendments, commonly used in organic farming, are effective in the management of several soil borne plant pathogens and phytoparasitic nematodes (Nico et al, 2004) and at the same time can improve soil fertility as well as productivity and quality of plant products (Bulluck et al, 2002;Rivera & Aballay, 2008). In particular, in the Mediterranean countries, in the areas of cultivation of olive, the disposal of olive mill wastes represents a serious environmental problem as large amounts of these materials are produced in a short period every year.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nematicidal and fertilizing effects of chicken manure, fresh and composted olive mill wastes on organic melon

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fertilizing and nematicidal effects of three organic amendments were evaluated in a pot experiment on melon plants infested by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. A soil artificially infested with 4 eggs and juveniles/ ml soil of the nematode was amended with: a) virgin olive pomace (VOP); b) composted olive pomace (COP); c) chicken manure based fertilizer (CM) and d) chicken manure based fertilizer combined with the biological control agent Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251, brand name BioAct WG (CMB). VOP was applied at doses of 11 (VOP-A), 22 (VOP-B) and 44 t/ha (VOP-C); COP at 4.5 (COP-A), 9 (COP-B) and 18 t/ha (COP-C); CM at 3 t/ha and CMB at 3 t/ha combined with 4 kg/ha of BioAct WG. Untreated soil was used as control. The treatments CM, CMB, VOP-B and COP-B were established on the basis of N requirement of melon plants (120 kg/ha) taking into account soil and amendments N availability. Two weeks later amendment application and nematode inoculation, the soil was poured in 4.8 l clay pots which were arranged in a greenhouse according to a randomized block design with ten replications for each treatment. A one-month old melon seedling (cv. Galia) was transplanted in each pot and organic farming management practices were used during the growing period. At the end of the experiment, 60 days after transplant, plants were uprooted and height, fresh and dry shoot and root weights were recorded. Root gall index, on the roots, caused by the nematode attack, was estimated according to a 0–5 scale. Final nematode population density and reproduction rate were also calculated for each pot. All data were subjected to statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means compared according to Least Significant Difference’s Test. Nematode population and root infestation were significantly suppressed by the addition of all amendments, compared to untreated control. However, CM and CMB resulted in a total more suppressive effect and in a significantly higher plant growth in comparison to all the other treatments. A significant correlation was found between root gall index and eggs and juveniles/g root and final nematode population density. No signifycant correlations were found between nematological parameters or plant growth parameters and amendment doses.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nematicidal and fertilizing effects of chicken manure, fresh and composted olive mill wastes on organic melon

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In particular, the suppressive effect of soil amendments, with a wide range of composted waste materials, on plant parasitic nematodes was largely and frequently documented, although an inconsistent nematode control or variable effects were also described in literature (Szczech et al, 1993;McSorley & Gallagher, 1995;McSorley et al, 1997;Akhtar & Malik, 2000;Zhao et al, 2003). Therefore, the nematicidal effect of compost amendments is scarcely predictable as depending on the starting raw HELMINTHOLOGIA, 48, 3: 184 -194, 2011 The effect of soil compost treatments on potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida M. RENČO 1 , N. SASANELLI 2 , P. KOVÁČIK materials, the type of composting process, the maturity of the final product incorporated into the soil, nematode species present and season of application (Rodríguez-Kábana et al, 1987;Rivera & Aballay, 2008). Many mechanisms can be involved in this suppressive effect such as decomposition of the compost into the soil and ammonia production, stimulation of soil microbial biomass and release of biocidal substances, which have nematicide activity (McSorley & Gallaher, 1996;Oka & Yermiyahu, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of soil compost treatments on potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A pot experiment on potato was carried out to verify the nematicidal effect of four composts of different origin (C1: 70 % horse manure + 15 % sugar beet pomace + 5 % poultry manure + 10% grape pomace; C2: 100 % pig manure decomposed by juveniles of Musca domestica; C3: 100 % vermicompost from medical plants wastes; C4: 100 % vermicompost from cattle manure) on the potato cyst nematodes G. rostochiensis (Ro1) and G. pallida (Pa2 and Pa3). Composts at different rates (1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 % w/w) were mixed with the nematode infested soils. Pots with unamended soils were used as control. Pots (4 l) were arranged in a glasshouse according to a randomized block design with four replications per each treatment. A significant reduction in number of cysts, eggs and juveniles/cyst and eggs and juveniles/g soil was observed in each compost in comparison to unamended soil. The suppressive nematode effect increased according to the compost NH 4 + content and compost rate.

show abstract

“…The same trend was observed with the use of goat manure for three years and the mixture of goat manure with fava bean, barley, and mustard green rotations in the Huasco vineyard. Indeed, the use of manure has proven be an efficient alternative for controlling different PPNs in several crops (Rodriguez-Kábana et al, 1987) and in grape vines (Rivera and Aballay, 2008). In this study, the observed differences may be due to the application rate, which has not been determined for different manures and conditions of grapevine growth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Control of plant-parasitic nematodes using cover crops in table grape cultivation in Chile

et al. 2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

C. Baginsky, A. Contreras, J.I. Covarrubias, O. Seguel, and E. Aballay. 2013. Control of plant-parasitic nematodes using cover crops in table grape cultivation in Chile Cien. Inv. Agr. 40(3): 547-557. A study to evaluate the effect of a three-year rotation with cover crops for the management of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) was performed in two vineyards producing table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) in a semiarid region in the north of Chile. In the first vineyard, located in Copiapó valley (trial I), the crops used in the rotations or monoculture were fava bean (Vicia faba) cv. Aguadulce, rape (Brassica napus var. napus) cv L-456, forage turnip (B. rapa var. rapa) cv. Barkant, barley (Hordeum vulgare) cv. Aurora, oat (Avena sativa) cv. Urano-INIA, and mustard greens (Brassica juncea). At the second vineyard employed in the study, located in Huasco valley (trial II), the same crops and varieties were used in a rotation system with the incorporation of crop/goat manure mixtures or manure only at a rate of 10 Mg ha -1 . In both studies, two control treatments were included: a nontreated control and a chemical control in which ethoprop was applied at a rate of 7 kg ha -1 . The results from trial I indicated no significant differences between the cover crop rotation treatments and controls for Xiphinema index and for the other PPNs populations. In trial II, treatments 4 (manure) and 5 (manure and crop rotation) showed significantly lower values compared to treatment 2 (chemical control), with the highest X. index levels, but no differences from the control. No differences were detected for the other PPNs.

show abstract

Nematicide Effect of Various Organic Soil Amendments on Meloidogyne ethiopica Whitehead, 1968, on Potted Vine Plants

Cited by 22 publications

References 4 publications

Nematicidal and fertilizing effects of chicken manure, fresh and composted olive mill wastes on organic melon

Nematicidal and fertilizing effects of chicken manure, fresh and composted olive mill wastes on organic melon

The effect of soil compost treatments on potato cyst nematodes Globodera rostochiensis and Globodera pallida

Control of plant-parasitic nematodes using cover crops in table grape cultivation in Chile

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About