1982
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.25.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nematic—smectic-A—smectic-Cmulticritical point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the mixtures 7OS5/8OS5 were the following: the N-SmA transitions show strong pretransitional heat capacity anomalies characteristic for the nematic-smectic A transition and the weakening (in terms of energetic effects) of the transitions as the tricritical point is approached. The entropy of the N-SmC transition rapidly decreases and vanishes at the polycritical point [15,16]. A similar change of transition entropy and enthalpy was observed for N-SmA transitions of several mixtures of 7OS5 and 8OS5 [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained for the mixtures 7OS5/8OS5 were the following: the N-SmA transitions show strong pretransitional heat capacity anomalies characteristic for the nematic-smectic A transition and the weakening (in terms of energetic effects) of the transitions as the tricritical point is approached. The entropy of the N-SmC transition rapidly decreases and vanishes at the polycritical point [15,16]. A similar change of transition entropy and enthalpy was observed for N-SmA transitions of several mixtures of 7OS5 and 8OS5 [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The entropy of the N-SmC transition rapidly decreases and vanishes at the polycritical point [15,16]. A similar change of transition entropy and enthalpy was observed for N-SmA transitions of several mixtures of 7OS5 and 8OS5 [15].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…80.3 + 20.3 (Johnson et al, 1975); C6 + C7 (Achard et al, 1976); C7 + C8 (Achard ef al., 1976); 7S5 + 8S5 (Johnson et al, 1977;Safinya et al, 1981Safinya et al, ,1983Witanachchi et al, 1983;DeHoff et al, 1982) 60 CB + 80 CB ; 9CB + 10 CB (Thoen eral., 1984); 8CB + lOCB (Marynissen et al, 1985); 608 + 6010 (Anisimov et al, 1988) ; 7S5 + 80 CB (Huster et al, 1987); 40.6 + 60.4 (Rananavare et al, 1987); 6012 + 6010 (Anisimov et al, 1987;1990); 608 + 6010; (Anisimov, 1988); 608 + 6010 + 6012 (Anisimov, 1988); 40.8 + 60.8 (Stine and Garland, 1989); 508 + 608 (Thoen and Parret, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%