2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05325-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NEK1 kinase domain structure and its dynamic protein interactome after exposure to Cisplatin

Abstract: NEK family kinases are serine/threonine kinases that have been functionally implicated in the regulation of the disjunction of the centrosome, the assembly of the mitotic spindle, the function of the primary cilium and the DNA damage response. NEK1 shows pleiotropic functions and has been found to be mutated in cancer cells, ciliopathies such as the polycystic kidney disease, as well as in the genetic diseases short-rib thoracic dysplasia, Mohr-syndrome and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. NEK1 is essential for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(101 reference statements)
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next investigated whether introduction of an HRD+2 threonine and/or APE-4 isoleucine in a serine/threonine kinase would be sufficient to induce tyrosine-directed activity. These mutational experiments were conducted using Nek1, since its structure is known (Melo-Hanchuk et al, 2017), wild-type Nek1 did not efficiently phosphorylate peptide substrates on tyrosine in our experiments (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A), and, like all other Nek kinases except Nek10, Nek1 has an HRD+2 lysine and APE-4 proline (Figure 3E,H). However, murine Nek1 has been reported to be a dual-specificity kinase (Letwin et al, 1992), suggesting that Nek1 might have intrinsic tyrosine-phosphorylation capacity in specific contexts, and might therefore be more susceptible than other serine/threonine kinases to mutations that broaden phospho-acceptor specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We next investigated whether introduction of an HRD+2 threonine and/or APE-4 isoleucine in a serine/threonine kinase would be sufficient to induce tyrosine-directed activity. These mutational experiments were conducted using Nek1, since its structure is known (Melo-Hanchuk et al, 2017), wild-type Nek1 did not efficiently phosphorylate peptide substrates on tyrosine in our experiments (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A), and, like all other Nek kinases except Nek10, Nek1 has an HRD+2 lysine and APE-4 proline (Figure 3E,H). However, murine Nek1 has been reported to be a dual-specificity kinase (Letwin et al, 1992), suggesting that Nek1 might have intrinsic tyrosine-phosphorylation capacity in specific contexts, and might therefore be more susceptible than other serine/threonine kinases to mutations that broaden phospho-acceptor specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To rationalize the unusual selectivity for acidic residues displayed by Group 4 Nek kinases, we compared the X-ray crystal structures of the Nek1 and Nek7 kinase domains (Haq et al, 2015; Melo-Hanchuk et al, 2017). This revealed the presence of two basic regions in Nek7 that are absent from Nek1, and might accommodate acidic residues N-terminal of the phospho-acceptor site (Figure 6F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, NEK1 is involved in cell cycle progression and many DNA Damage Response (DDR) pathways. NEK1 was shown to interact with several DNA repair proteins, suggesting that it plays a key role in the DNA damage response (DDR) [30]. Finally, it has been suggested that NEK1 is involved in gametogenesis, due to its high expression levels in meiotic tissues [17] and important roles in spermatogenesis [22] and spindle assembly in meiosis I [17].…”
Section: Nek1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein used had a T162A mutation, the principal site of activating phosphorylation, and was therefore in an inactive state. Unlike Nek2, the activation loop of inactive Nek1 was fully ordered, albeit in a conformation that is incompatible with substrate binding (Melo-Hanchuk et al, 2017 ). The region of the activation loop in the vicinity of residue 162 formed an α-helix.…”
Section: Biochemical Regulation Of Mitotic Nek Kinasesmentioning
confidence: 99%