Neither fast, nor easy: the prospect of Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Ghana

Abstract

On the basis of a detailed case study of the High Forest Zone of Ghana, the paper challenges the common narrative of REDD as being fast and easy. The paper analyses proximate and underlying causes of deforestation and degradation and finds that these processes are driven by multiple underlying causes. The paper goes on to argue that the causes of deforestation and degradation that are found within the realm of the forestry sector, to which REDD measures will be largely confined, have emerged as a result of a political economy that gives priority to economic development over forest conservation, while at the same time allowing powerful interest groups, in particular the political and administrative elite, to financially benefit from resource depletion. The analysis suggests that forest conserving policy reforms are unlikely to come fast and easy, and that the prospect of future REDD payments may not accelerate them. It is argued that the case of Ghana is not unique and that REDD implementation may face similar constraints in many developing countries.

Landscape Fragmentation as a Risk Factor for Buruli Ulcer Disease in Ghana

“…15 Rapid land cover change has taken place in Ghana in recent decades. For example, forest area has decreased roughly 2% per year since the 1990s, 16 while agriculture has grown very rapidly and expanded at an annual rate of 5.5%. 17 In addition, across Ghana, gold mining has increased sharply in recent decades.…”

The "World System" Of the Paris Agreement: Exploring The Construction, Dissemination, And Implementation of Climate Knowledge Through Redd

“…Moreover, resource access and use largely favors economic development over conservation, which leads to inequitable outcomes (Pedroni et al 2009). The significant financial resources that could become available under REDD+ might exacerbate, rather than address, institutional and social factors that contribute to forest loss and degradation, such as elite capture of benefits and corrupt behaviors (Hansen et al 2009;Sikor et al 2010). The broad goals of REDD+ (i.e.…”

Forest Restoration Paradigms

“…Thus, no one-to-one correspondence exists between degradation agents and indicators ( Table 1). The causes of degradation (and deforestation) may be grouped as macroeconomic, demographic, technological, and governance factors (Kanninen et al, 2007) and primacy of a driver can be quite complicated to unravel (e.g., Hansen, Lund, & Treue, 2009 Because forest ecosystems are dynamic, disturbance is more the norm than the exception; it is common to many spatial and temporal scales, at all levels of ecological organization (Beatty & Owen, 2005;Turner, 2010). Even though humans are unquestionably the primary cause of most forest degradation, extensive, infrequent, or severe natural disturbances may diminish the capacity of a forest to supply products and services or both (Dale, Lugo, MacMahon, & Pickett, 1998).…”