2009
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.086033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and maternal factors at birth as moderators of the association between birth characteristics and school attainment: a population study of children attending government schools in Western Australia

Abstract: These findings suggest that having suboptimal growth in utero or an older sibling at birth increases vulnerability to poor literacy attainment especially among children born to single mothers or those in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. These data provide evidence for advocating lifestyles compatible with optimum fetal growth and socioeconomic conditions conducive to healthy lifestyles, particularly during pregnancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Explanatory variables were selected on the basis of previous studies that described the association of specific risk factors with education outcomes. Variables available from the perinatal dataset were: gestational age, birthweight, Apgar scores at 5 min, maternal age, child gender, parity, maternal smoking and alcohol consumption . Variables selected from student information data were: maternal education, Indigenous status, age of child and remoteness of residence .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Explanatory variables were selected on the basis of previous studies that described the association of specific risk factors with education outcomes. Variables available from the perinatal dataset were: gestational age, birthweight, Apgar scores at 5 min, maternal age, child gender, parity, maternal smoking and alcohol consumption . Variables selected from student information data were: maternal education, Indigenous status, age of child and remoteness of residence .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is likely a genetic effect; however the magnitude of the genetic effect on child mental abilities or achievement, has been shown to vary by the SES of the population being assessed, with genetics playing a much smaller role in disadvantaged, low SES populations, presumably because genetic effects are not fully realized until sufficient cognitive stimulation is present in a population (Harden, Turkheimer, & Loehlin, 2007; Turkheimer, Haley, & Waldheimer, 2003). Likewise several recent studies documented that associations between adverse perinatal outcomes such as intrauterine growth restriction and child cognition were not always apparent in low SES population (Drews-Botsch et al, 2011; Malacova et al, 2009). Finally, beyond population-SES factors, specific neighborhood factors that influence livability, cohesiveness, and safety which are certainly related to the SES of a population might additionally impact child cognitive performance through a other relationships, particularly post-natal environmental factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Malacova et al (2009) reported that among children born to mothers residing in higher SES areas in Western Australia, there was a strong, linear relationship between birthweight and reading scores; however, among children from disadvantaged neighborhoods, reading scores were low for all groups, regardless of birthweight. Likewise, Drews-Botsch et al (2011) found that among children from disadvantaged families born at a public hospital the prevalence of cognitive deficit was high overall and not further influenced by birthweight-for-gestational-age; however an association between SGA and subsequent cognitive deficit was evident among children born at a private hospital that served a much higher SES population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%