“…(see, for example, [3,Chapter 7.4]) It was shown in [12, Theorem 1.2] that a G-neighbour-transitive code Γ with δ(Γ ) ≥ 3 has the following property, called G-strong incidence transitivity: the group G is transitive on Γ and, for γ ∈ Γ , Gγ is transitive on the set of pairs (u, u ′ ) with u ∈ γ, u ′ ∈ V \ γ. In the case where δ(Γ ) = 2, the same theorem shows that G-strong incidence transitivity is equivalent to G-transitivity on pairs (γ, γ 1 ) with γ ∈ Γ, γ 1 ∈ Γ 1 , a property strictly stronger than G-neighbour transitivity, see [12,Remark 1.5]. The major signifiance of [12, Theorem 1.2] for this paper, however, is its final assertion: namely that, if G is primitive on V, then G-strong incidence transitivity implies that G is 2-transitive on V. Since the finite 2-transitive permutation groups are known explicitly as a consequence of the classification of the finite simple groups (see, for example, [3]), this result offers a way forward to a possible classification of the G-strongly incidence transitive codes in J(v, k).…”