2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhe.2018.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighbors and networks: The role of social interactions on the residential choices of housing choice voucher holders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that households that had one additional neighbor who recently leased up were nearly 3 percent more likely to lease up themselves. These estimates add to recent evidence that social interactions with neighbors may influence where voucher users choose to live (Ellen, Suher, & Torrats‐Espinosa, ), and complement a broader literature that shows peers affect program take‐up (Aizer & Currie, 2004; Dahl, Loken, & Mogstad, ; Duflo & Saez, ; Figlio, Hamersma, & Roth, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results show that households that had one additional neighbor who recently leased up were nearly 3 percent more likely to lease up themselves. These estimates add to recent evidence that social interactions with neighbors may influence where voucher users choose to live (Ellen, Suher, & Torrats‐Espinosa, ), and complement a broader literature that shows peers affect program take‐up (Aizer & Currie, 2004; Dahl, Loken, & Mogstad, ; Duflo & Saez, ; Figlio, Hamersma, & Roth, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We can relate many of the variables in our data to the probability of finding a unit, the expected benefits of leasing, and the costs associated with search. The probability of finding a unit is related to the supply of suitable units, the number of landlords willing to lease to housing voucher recipients, and the family's search strategy, which may be informed by those in its social network (Ellen, Suher, & Torrats‐Espinosa, ). Variables in our data that may relate to the probability of finding a unit include the number of adults and children in the household, because larger units may be more difficult to find within the allotted search time (Popkin & Cunningham, ) .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our selection model rules out the possibility of interference. While there is reason to believe this assumption is violated in the context of MTO(Ellen, Suher, & Torrats-Espinosa, 2019), we leave relaxing this assumption to future work because doing so creates significant new obstacles to identification(Sobel, 2006;Manski, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our selection model rules out the possibility of interference. While there is reason to believe this assumption is violated in the context of MTO(Ellen et al (2018)), we leave relaxing this assumption to future work because doing so creates significant new obstacles to identification(Sobel (2006),Manski (2013)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%