2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-8123-0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with multimorbidity in a geographically-defined community

Abstract: Background: Persons with low socioeconomic status may be disproportionately at risk for multimorbidity. Methods: Adults aged ≥20 years on 4/1/2015 from 7 counties in Minnesota were identified using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (population-based sample). A composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, the area deprivation index (ADI), was estimated at the census block group level (n = 251). The prevalence of 21 chronic conditions was obtained to calculate the proportion of persons with mul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three studies defined severe or complex multimorbidity (according to various terms) in addition to overall multi morbidity, with the cutoff point for severe defined as four or more chronic conditions in included in the final review two studies 23,24 and five or more chronic conditions in one study. 25 376 (66•4%) studies used a simple count of conditions to measure multimorbidity, 155 (27•4%) used weighted indices, 27 (4•8%) used both types of measures together, and eight (1•4%) did not report the type of measure used (table 1, appendix pp 5-71). In studies that used a weighted index, 149 used a diseasebased index, and six used a medicationbased index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies defined severe or complex multimorbidity (according to various terms) in addition to overall multi morbidity, with the cutoff point for severe defined as four or more chronic conditions in included in the final review two studies 23,24 and five or more chronic conditions in one study. 25 376 (66•4%) studies used a simple count of conditions to measure multimorbidity, 155 (27•4%) used weighted indices, 27 (4•8%) used both types of measures together, and eight (1•4%) did not report the type of measure used (table 1, appendix pp 5-71). In studies that used a weighted index, 149 used a diseasebased index, and six used a medicationbased index.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some vulnerable groups with chronic conditions may be at risk of becoming frail earlier in life, while the onset of illness and disability occurs at younger ages for people living in areas of greater deprivation. [18][19][20] There is, therefore, potential for younger groups to be classed as frail, and identification may aid the delivery of timely care. Furthermore, studies are increasingly measuring frailty prevalence across the life span.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revised ADI is a validated instrument that has been used by researchers and government agencies such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [16]. Recently, a number of studies have been published using the ADI [17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%