2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and urban public green spaces availability: A localized modeling approach to inform land use policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a study on the central neighborhoods of Teheran, Iran found that low-SES people live in closer proximity to green spaces than more affluent residents [83], while an investigation on the entire metropolitan area of Teheran showed the opposite [84]. Contrasting results also emerged for Shanghai, with more studies finding inequity for green space proximity [81,82,91,98] than equity [99]. Three studies in Latin American cities (Santiago de Chile; Hermosillo, Mexico; Bogotá, Colombia) [18,38,80], and three other studies in African cities (Cairo, Egypt; Cape Town, South Africa) [21,86,96] found that high-SES people live closer to parks than low-SES people.…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Vary Based On Geomentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, a study on the central neighborhoods of Teheran, Iran found that low-SES people live in closer proximity to green spaces than more affluent residents [83], while an investigation on the entire metropolitan area of Teheran showed the opposite [84]. Contrasting results also emerged for Shanghai, with more studies finding inequity for green space proximity [81,82,91,98] than equity [99]. Three studies in Latin American cities (Santiago de Chile; Hermosillo, Mexico; Bogotá, Colombia) [18,38,80], and three other studies in African cities (Cairo, Egypt; Cape Town, South Africa) [21,86,96] found that high-SES people live closer to parks than low-SES people.…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Vary Based On Geomentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A few studies exemplify the trends displayed in Tables 4-7. For proximity, studies in six Chinese cities (e.g., Shanghai, Beijing, Zhongshan, Shenzhen, Wuhan, Macau) showed that high-SES people tend to live closer to urban green spaces than low-SES people, with effect sizes ranging from large to very small [74,81,82,91,92,94,95,97,98,100,101,103,104]. Depending on the methods and sample size, studies focusing on the same city found contrasting results.…”
Section: Results: Do Inequities In the Global South Vary Based On Geomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GWR is a local spatial statistical method for evaluating how the relationships between a dependent variable and one or more explanatory variables change spatially. As one of the useful tools to explore the spatial local heterogeneity, GWR has been widely used in many fields in recent years, For example, the geographic variation and impact factors of urban public green space availability [46], peri-urban agriculture [47], noise pollution [48], population [49] and resident recreation demand [50] have been investigated with GWR. The GWR method was usually compared with global spatial statistical methods, such as the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression, regression kriging, or co-kriging and the comparisons showed the advantages of GWR in improving mapping quality and exploring spatially varying local relationships [47][48][49][50][51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Alberti, Marzluff, 2004;Conway, et al, 2010;Colusca, Alpopi, 2011;Cohen, et al, 2012;Wolch, et al, 2014;Feltynowski, 2015;Lee, et al, 2015;Davis, 2016;Li, Liu, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%