2010
DOI: 10.1175/2010waf2222404.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neighborhood-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts from Convection-Allowing NCAR WRF Model Simulations and the Operational NAM

Abstract: Since 2003 the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) has been running various experimental convection-allowing configurations of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) for domains covering a large portion of the central United States during the warm season (April-July). In this study, the skill of 3-hourly accumulated precipitation forecasts from a large sample of these convection-allowing simulations conducted during 2004-05 and 2007-08 is compared to that from operational North American M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
82
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
6
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the well known problems related to grid-spacing decrease is associated with slight displacement errors, which often result in double penalties, creating difficulties to assess the true quality of high resolution simulations (Clark et al, 2010). Many studies have been focused on the verification practices; for example, Casati et al (2008) presented a review of the forecast verification procedures, related to spatial verification methods, probabilistic forecasts and ensemble verification.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the well known problems related to grid-spacing decrease is associated with slight displacement errors, which often result in double penalties, creating difficulties to assess the true quality of high resolution simulations (Clark et al, 2010). Many studies have been focused on the verification practices; for example, Casati et al (2008) presented a review of the forecast verification procedures, related to spatial verification methods, probabilistic forecasts and ensemble verification.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Useful verification and evaluation of convectionallowing models 1 requires ''nontraditional'' approaches that do not rely on point-to-point matches of forecast and observed fields (e.g., Roberts and Lean 2008;Casati et al 2008;Clark et al 2010, and many others). These nontraditional approaches are needed because, as grid resolution increases, the time scales at which very accurate predictability is possible on the grid scale become very short (e.g., Lorenz 1969).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MODE has also been used to evaluate convectionallowing forecasts generated by the Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) in support of the 2009 and 2010 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Hazardous Weather Testbed (NOAA/ HWT) Spring Forecasting Experiments (Kain et al 2010a;Jensen et al 2010;Clark et al 2012a). Simply overlaying forecast and observed reflectivity objects defined by MODE revealed that forecasts without radar-dataassimilation frequently contained MCSs with an upstream lag relative to forecasts with radar-data-assimilation during the first 0-6 h of the forecasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations