Abstract:In acknowledging that patterns of neighborhood attachment—a key component in the maintenance of neighborhood vitality—may shift as a result of growing racial and ethnic diversity, this study develops a multiethnic and multilevel framework to examine the link between racial diversity and attachment among Los Angeles residents. The expansion of the Asian and Hispanic populations may affect attachment patterns if group members exhibit different levels of attachment compared with blacks and whites, due to factors … Show more
“…First, these findings support our fourth hypothesis-(H4) community connection is increased by organizational membership-reflecting a robust body of research (Greif 2009;Putnam 2000Putnam , 2007Sampson 2012). Building on the existing work, we found that even when accounting for segregation and socioeconomic status of neighborhoods, participation in an organization improves one's community connection.…”
There exists an active discussion as to the effects of racial/ethnic composition on community connection. Research has suggested that racial segregation is beneficial to one's community connection. To explore this dynamic, we investigate how an individual's community connection is determined by the racial/ethnic segregation of his or her neighborhood, among other independent variables. We implement multilevel models using individual data from the socioeconomic status of a neighborhood explains much of the variations in community connection, non-Hispanic Blacks living in predominantly White or mixed communities tend to have a weaker community connection than their counterparts in other types of neighborhood. This demonstrates that segregation and socioeconomic status explain community connection.
“…First, these findings support our fourth hypothesis-(H4) community connection is increased by organizational membership-reflecting a robust body of research (Greif 2009;Putnam 2000Putnam , 2007Sampson 2012). Building on the existing work, we found that even when accounting for segregation and socioeconomic status of neighborhoods, participation in an organization improves one's community connection.…”
There exists an active discussion as to the effects of racial/ethnic composition on community connection. Research has suggested that racial segregation is beneficial to one's community connection. To explore this dynamic, we investigate how an individual's community connection is determined by the racial/ethnic segregation of his or her neighborhood, among other independent variables. We implement multilevel models using individual data from the socioeconomic status of a neighborhood explains much of the variations in community connection, non-Hispanic Blacks living in predominantly White or mixed communities tend to have a weaker community connection than their counterparts in other types of neighborhood. This demonstrates that segregation and socioeconomic status explain community connection.
“…Comparative data suggest that the notion of neighborhood identity (or the related concept, ''neighborhood attachment") is a common, perhaps universal, attribute of neighborhoods cross-culturally. Neighborhood identity is reported in ethnographic studies of nonwestern cities (Mills, 2004), in documentary analyses of preindustrial cities (Marcus, 1989;Smail, 2000), and in sociological research on modern industrial cities (Greif, 2009). The topic of identification with one's district may be more variable.…”
“…Se ha usado el tipo de vivienda, el tipo de colonia, la condición migratoria, así como otras variables regionales, demográficas y socioeconómicas. En particular se ha estudiado cómo difiere la satisfacción con la colonia de: los residentes locales y los extranjeros (Li, 2012;Oktay et al, 2012); los residentes beneficiarios de programas de vivienda gubernamentales en áreas urbanas frente a los de los sitios suburbanos (Cook, 1988); los residentes en áreas centrales en comparación con los que viven en la periferia de las áreas centrales (Loo, 1986); los residentes en suburbios convencionales respecto a los que viven en colonias que tienen diseños tradicionales (Lavejoy et al, 2010); las personas que residen en colonias con dife-rentes esquemas o tipos de vivienda (Djebami y Al-Abed, 2000;Gruber y Shelton, 1987); los residentes de acuerdo con su raza (Greif, 2009;Lee et al, 1991;Hunter, 1974;Campbell et al, 1976;Fried, 1982;Ahlbrandt, 1984); las comunidades compactas frente a las mixtas, que concentran los lugares de empleo y vivienda, así como el uso eficiente del suelo y la reducción de las distancias (Yang, 2008); las comunidades que cobran cuotas de mantenimiento en contraposición con aquellas que no tienen esa práctica (Chapman y Lombard, 2006). Asimismo se ha analizado la influencia de las características sociodemográficas y el tipo de colonia (clasificadas en áreas afluentes y desfavorecidas) en el grado de satisfacción con la colonia (Hipp, 2009;Parkes et al, 2002), así como la influencia de la mezcla de residentes, en términos del régimen de propiedad en la colonia (Kearns y Mason, 2007).…”
Section: Literatura En Torno a La Satisfacción Con La Coloniaunclassified
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.