Negotiation characteristics in brownfield redevelopment projects

Yousefi, Saied; Hipel, Keith W.; Hegazy, Tarek; Witmer, J.A.; Gray, Pamela N.

doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4414193

Cited by 15 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By explicitly addressing and dealing with conflicting objectives, decision-makers can more clearly discuss and reach mutual agreements and socially acceptable outcomes (Yousefi et al, 2007). Along these lines, the utilization of GMCR for third party negotiations has shown that a coordinator or other third-party negotiator can use these models to facilitate communication with multiple decision-makers (Hipel et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Conflict models can also facilitate negotiations by supporting the development of common perspectives of the situation (Okada and Sakakibara, 2004); clarifying the diverse, and often conflicting interests and viewpoints, of different decision-makers; identifying trade-offs; and collaboratively generating solutions that integrate multiple preferences (Yousefi et al, 2007). By explicitly addressing and dealing with conflicting objectives, decision-makers can more clearly discuss and reach mutual agreements and socially acceptable outcomes (Yousefi et al, 2007).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of a brownfield management conflict in Canada

Philpot

Johnson

Hipel

2017

Hydrological Research Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:A strategic analysis of an ongoing brownfield management conflict in Elmira, Ontario, Canada is conducted using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. This investigation of the situation as it existed in late 2016 constitutes an expansion of an earlier analysis of the dispute which focused on cleansing the groundwater aquifer, polluted by a chemical company in Elmira, to a controversy over the management of the pollution impacts on an adjacent creek. Besides the chemical plant, the other decision-makers involved in the 2016 dispute are the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change of the Province of Ontario, local government, and a citizens' advisory group. The connections of the 2016 conflict to the earlier study which took place in 1991 are discussed and the evolution of the previous situation to the current one is explored in depth, along with strategic insights.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of a brownfield management conflict in Canada

Philpot

Johnson

Hipel

2017

Hydrological Research Letters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This article emphasizes the possibility of using decision support tools to select the most optimal vacant office building that will be used for housing of young tenants. The benefits of using DSS in urban development practice in transformation projects has been already reported [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”

Section: A Decision Support Tool For Transformation Of Office Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

Potential Transformation of Vacant Offices into Housing: a Decision Support Tool

2014

Universal Researchers (UR) Dec. 25-26, 2014 at Dubai (UAE)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Coffin, 2003;Thomas, 2003) and conflicting interests (e.g. Blokhuis et al, 2012;Yousefi et al, 2007), which might lead to a lack of consensus among key actors and consequently cause the stagnation of BR (Glumac et al, 2013).These issues compose a negotiation process. Formally, within decision-making theory, PPP negotiations are classified as an interactive normative or a collaborative prescriptive approach (Raiffa, 2002).…”

Section: Public-private Partnership Negotiations For Brownfield Redevmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further, contributions have also been made in the field of BR (Alberini et al, 2005;Chen et al, 2009;Mayer et al, 2005;Pfrang and Witting, 2008;Shan and Xu, 1996;Sounderpandian et al, 2005;Thomas, 2002;Walker et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2007Wang et al, , 2008Wang et al, , 2009Wang et al, , 2011Wang et al, , 2013Wey and Wu, 2008;Yousefi et al, 2007;Zeng and Zhou, 2001).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment

Glumac

Han

Schaefer

2016

Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban development cannot proceed without the commitment of multiple actors, because decisionmaking processes have become more and more interdependent. This article supports better decision-making in brownfield redevelopment projects in cases where the project realization depends on a public-private partnership between a municipality and a developer. In a broader sense, in this research, we investigate how the negotiation process in brownfield redevelopment projects can be improved by providing an understanding of the characteristics of a brownfield area and the interaction between the parties involved. In order to improve the process, a negotiation decision model is proposed. This is a hybrid model consisting of five phases. Its novelty lies in the combination of a latent class model and a strategic choice model that can be formulated as a prescriptive-interactive approach in decision theory. The hybrid negotiation model is applied to a reconstructed case study in order to present its possibilities. Accordingly, three applications of the model are introduced, and in each application the beneficiary is a municipality. Although using decision models for brownfield redevelopment projects has already been thoroughly studied, there is little evidence concerning the prescriptive-interactive component built into existing models.

show abstract

Negotiation characteristics in brownfield redevelopment projects

Cited by 15 publications

References 9 publications

Analysis of a brownfield management conflict in Canada

Analysis of a brownfield management conflict in Canada

Potential Transformation of Vacant Offices into Housing: a Decision Support Tool

A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About