2005
DOI: 10.1080/14725880500052782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating the marketplace: The role(s) of Holocaust museums today

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their findings suggest that Holocaust tourism can be a space in which to articulate animosity, but they also argue that some Jewish tourists avoid visits to Holocaust tourism sites because of the absence of 'Jewish life' in the environs. Wollaston (2006) proposes four cultural and societal roles for Holocaust heritage sites, suggesting they simultaneously satisfy roles as sites of mass tourism, memorials to the dead, vehicles of historical exposition and educational organisations that exist to communicate the lessons of Holocaust. These arguments resonate with the well-documented concept of heritage dissonance (Tunbridge and Ashworth, 1996).…”
Section: Holocaust Heritage In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings suggest that Holocaust tourism can be a space in which to articulate animosity, but they also argue that some Jewish tourists avoid visits to Holocaust tourism sites because of the absence of 'Jewish life' in the environs. Wollaston (2006) proposes four cultural and societal roles for Holocaust heritage sites, suggesting they simultaneously satisfy roles as sites of mass tourism, memorials to the dead, vehicles of historical exposition and educational organisations that exist to communicate the lessons of Holocaust. These arguments resonate with the well-documented concept of heritage dissonance (Tunbridge and Ashworth, 1996).…”
Section: Holocaust Heritage In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…people suffer graciously and selfishly too” (Gordon, 2008: 5). In other words, such approaches do not leave room for exploration of the various choices these people made and the consequences that ensued throughout their lives (though see Dixon, 2017 and Wollaston, 2016, for analysis of the ethical challenges of representing perpetrators). Although there are scattered instances in which the stories of perpetrators are told within the Lubyanka heritagescape—for example, during interpretation at the Garage Shooting Range—this is the exception rather than the rule.…”
Section: Grievability Blameability and Accountability In The Heritage...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recognised that shops and souvenirs at dark tourism sites need particular attention, as they may be considerably more complex than other forms of shops given the political and ideological influence (Buda & Shim, 2014;Buda, 2015;Wollaston, 2005). Understandably, these moral tensions are likely to be more profound as commodification of dark objects, places or events may arouse deeper emotions than other tourism contexts.…”
Section: Shops At the Dark Tourism Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Museum shops at dark sites raise ethical concerns about generating income from commercial activities which may diminish the commemoration of the sites (Brown, 2013;McKenzie, 2018;Potts, 2012;Wollaston, 2005). CRM partnerships may be a creative means for dark tourism sites to balance their commemorative, educational, and economic objectives.…”
Section: The Observed Site: the Museum-shop Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%