Negotiating the boundary between medicine and consumer culture: Online marketing of nutrigenetic tests

Abstract

Genomics researchers and policy makers have accused nutrigenetic testing companies—which provide DNA-based nutritional advice online—of misleading the public. The UK and USA regulation of the tests has hinged on whether they are classed as “medical” devices, and alternative regulatory categories for “lifestyle” and less-serious genetic tests have been proposed. This article presents the findings of a qualitative thematic analysis of the webpages of nine nutrigenetic testing companies. We argue that the companies, mirroring and negotiating the regulatory debates, were creating a new social space for products between medicine and consumer culture. This space was articulated through three themes: (i) how “genes” and tests were framed, (ii) how the individual was imagined vis a vis health information, and (iii) the advice and treatments offered. The themes mapped onto four frames or models for genetic testing: (i) clinical genetics, (ii) medicine, (iii) intermediate, and (iv) lifestyle. We suggest that the genomics researchers and policy makers appeared to perform what Gieryn (Gieryn, T.F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.) has termed “boundary work”, i.e., to delegitimize the tests as outside proper medicine and science. Yet, they legitimated them, though in a different way, by defining them as lifestyle, and we contend that the transformation of the boundaries of science into a creation of such hybrid or compromise categories is symptomatic of current historical times. Social scientists studying medicine have referred to the emergence of “lifestyle” products. This article contributes to this literature by examining the historical, regulatory and marketing processes through which certain goods and services become defined this way.

The effects of learning about one’s own genetic susceptibility to alcoholism: a randomized experiment

“…35 In light of these findings, it may not be surprising that some of the DTC companies offer "genetically tailored" nutrition supplements to potentially harness the emotional state of their consumers for marketing purposes. 36 These studies' results also indicate that individuals who learn that they have genetic susceptibility to alcoholism perceive lower personal ability to control alcohol consumption as compared with individuals who learn of no such susceptibility. This finding is important because of evidence showing that perceived behavioral control influences both behavioral intentions and actual behavior.…”

Nutrigenomics-based personalised nutritional advice: in search of a business model?

“…So far, despite the potential of personalised nutritional advice, applications in the field of nutrigenomics-based nutritional advice have met with little commercial success (Saukko et al 2010). This is probably best exemplified through the destiny of an early entrant into the market of nutrigenomics-based nutritional advice, Sciona, that has failed to find a viable business model for nutrigenomicsbased nutritional advice to commercially survive.…”

Shifting metaphors in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: from genes as information to genes as big data

“…This article derives from a larger project, which started in 2006 and examined the marketing and regulation of nutrigenetic testing companies (Saukko, Reed, Britten, & Hogarth, 2010). The project expanded to include the 23andMe's personal genome service in 2008.…”