Negotiating rights and faith: a study of rights‐based approaches to humanitarian action in Pakistan

Abstract

‘Rights‐based approaches’ (RBAs) have become a well‐established concept over the past two decades, informing the work of diverse actors involved in development and humanitarian aid. Faith‐based organisations have increasingly embraced the RBA, although not without contestation. Drawing on new qualitative data from Pakistan, this paper examines how ‘global’ RBA norms are operationalised in ‘local’ contexts characterised by great normative diversity and identifies three dominant normative frameworks used by non‐governmental organisations in the translation of RBAs: humanitarian standards; citizens' rights; and Islamic principles. It utilises a case study of RBAs in Pakistan and reveals the significance of religion and religious entities in the translation of rights. From this example, the paper makes a conceptual distinction between ‘instrumental’ and ‘substantial’ modes of engagement, a framing that allows for a more detailed analysis of how humanitarian actors deal with religion and rights than what is often found in studies of humanitarian action.

Towards a Conceptualisation of Relational Humanitarianism

“…Most of the work on what could be called socially embedded humanitarianism instead can be found in related fields and in situations that, if humanitarian Towards a Conceptualisation of Relational Humanitarianism actors were present, would have been described in humanitarian terms. We find them in research on urban displacement (Sanyal, 2021;Archer and Dodman, 2017), community resilience and social security (Bankoff, 2007;Hilhorst, 2018), philanthropy (Bornstein, 2009), hospitality (Brun, 2010), religious aid practices (Borchgrevink, 2022;Fiddian-Qasmiyeh and Paccito, 2015), civil society (Bankoff, 2007) and a range of other topics. Without claiming to be exhaustive or mutually exclusive, we discuss key literatures that study humanitarian acts as situated in socio-cultural practiceoften without reference to humanitarianism.…”

The role of European Union values in the Ukrainian social-humanitarian safety provision system

“…The author pointed out that the nature of such a system is based on the exploitation of the workers, the rulers, who control all the labor resources and the entirety of the social wealth and unfairly distribute them. Borchgrevink (2021) stresses the ambiguous role of religion in humanitarian action. The author applies a human rights-based approach to humanitarian action and suggests the importance of recognition the ways religious ethics and related practices can both impede and support the advancement of human rights.…”