Negotiating Continuity: Family and Religious Socialization for Second-Generation Asian Americans

Abstract

This article examines second-generation Asian Americans' explanations of the significant influences on their own religious identities. Data include interviews (N = 73) with college-aged Asian Americans from different religious traditions and ethnic backgrounds. Respondents viewed families as the most significant influence on current religiosity. Mothers and fathers were mentioned most often, followed by extended kin, siblings, and relatives, who acted as what we call "reinforcers," "substitutes," or "contrasts" to the roles that parents played in religious socialization. These roles occurred along two religious configurations within families: heterogeneous or homogeneous degrees of religious commitment and religious affiliation. Directions for future research and contributions to the religious transmission literature follow.

Secular Volunteerism among Texan Emerging Adults: Exploring Pathways of Childhood and Adulthood Religiosity

“…Echoing Bandura's social learning theory, researchers have noted that unique familial and community environments shape adolescents' and young adults' civic identities [73,74]. To summarize, these studies have established positive linkages between various dimensions of religiosity, ranging from public religious participation to private religious devotion, and civic engagement during adolescence or emerging adulthood [4,5,[75][76][77][78][79].…”

“…The high proportion of Hispanic Americans in South Texas also enables an examination of potential racial and ethnic differences in religious transmission across the life course. Based on extant studies finding that African and Asian Americans have high rates of religious transmission across the life course [4,5], we investigate whether these trends also hold in predominantly Hispanic populations.…”

Religious Socialization in Iranian Islamic Girls Schools

“…Many scholars believe that parental primary religious socialization has a long-life impact on religious identity of children (see e.g. Helve, 1991;Krause & Ellison, 2007;Hunsberger & Brown, 1984;Park & Ecklund, 2007;Himmelfarb, 1979). Despite the fact that family's influences could be considered directly, indirectly (through channelling children to religious peers, schools, organizations, etc.…”

Hinduism in India and Congregational Forms: Influences of Modernization and Social Networks

“…This position is particularly relevant for Hindus since second-generation Hindus may be more transnational than other immigrant religionists [34]. Kurien suggests precisely this notion, that diaspora congregations are playing a part in the increased popularity of congregations in India [5].…”