2000
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2000.11951642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiating a Change in the Argumentation Course: Teaching Cooperative Argument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An invitational rhetoric may, as Williams and McGee point out, free individuals to be potentially open to "constructive transformation, collapsing the dichotomy between 'persuasion' and 'empathy.'" 82 Foss and Griffin explain that invitational rhetoric may more specifically be useful to a peace community. It may "contribute to the efforts of communication scholars who are working to develop models for cooperative, nonadversarial, and ethical communication."…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An invitational rhetoric may, as Williams and McGee point out, free individuals to be potentially open to "constructive transformation, collapsing the dichotomy between 'persuasion' and 'empathy.'" 82 Foss and Griffin explain that invitational rhetoric may more specifically be useful to a peace community. It may "contribute to the efforts of communication scholars who are working to develop models for cooperative, nonadversarial, and ethical communication."…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on pedagogical models like Williams and McGee's (2000), the negotiation skills course would emphasize the teaching of both competitive and cooperative arguments. Adults in this course would learn about types of negotiation, including those distributive, integrative, attitudinal or intraorganizational (Walton & McKersie, 1965).…”
Section: Linguisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Academic debate is also part of thousands of argumentation courses taught in Communication departments across the country. While those courses still focus primarily and at times exclusively on debate, they do connect thousands of students to policy argument, and there have been recent moves to add more cooperative, dialogical, and deliberative components to the course (Czubaroff, 2007;Hyde & Binenam, 2000;Makau, 1990;Makau & Marty, 2001;Williams & McGee, 2000), or otherwise make debate more civic-minded (Mitchell, 2010, Munksgaard & Pfister, 2005. Alternatively, feminist theories of rhetoric have also developed that question the value of argumentative perspectives and seek to develop a more "invitational" rhetorical style focused on developing understanding and mutual respect (Bone et al , 2008;Foss & Griffin, 1995).…”
Section: Question #1: How Do We Improve How Citizens Process Informatmentioning
confidence: 99%