2016
DOI: 10.1186/s41039-016-0035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiated learner modelling to maintain today’s learner models

Abstract: Today's technology-enabled learning environments are becoming quite different from those of a few years ago, with the increased processing power as well as a wider range of educational tools. This situation produces more data, which can be fed back into the learning process. Open learner models have already been investigated as tools to promote metacognitive activities, in addition to their potential for maintaining the accuracy of learner models by allowing users to interact directly with them, providing furt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches such as the above allow learners to suggest changes to outdated or inaccurate representations in their learner model, and often also aim to promote learner reflection on their learning, as part of the discussion process [5]. This is possible in OLMs because the visualised data is not simply a count of activity or behaviorwhich will be an accurate count of instances (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches such as the above allow learners to suggest changes to outdated or inaccurate representations in their learner model, and often also aim to promote learner reflection on their learning, as part of the discussion process [5]. This is possible in OLMs because the visualised data is not simply a count of activity or behaviorwhich will be an accurate count of instances (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach of using Toulmin's argument structures to share internal inferring mechanisms with students is described in Van Labeke et al (2007). Bull (2016) reviews different approaches to negotiating the contents of the student model. In addition to Toulmin's based arguments patterns, approaches based on dialogue moves have been explored in the past (e.g., Dimitrova 2003;Bull and Pain 1995;Ginon et al 2016;Kerly and Bull 2008).…”
Section: Evidence-based Interaction With Osmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LA, OLM and EDM, data has been visually presented to learners through dashboards [2], [16], [23], [44], [50], [52] and through highly structured visualizations sometimes presenting multiple views on a single screen [11], [22]. Some of these visualizations allow data to be interpreted at a glance [52], [62], some provide brief explanations for the data presented [16], [60] and others require a deeper level of understanding through user scrutability and negotiation which may encourage reflection [11], [9]. Usage patterns presenting the number of sessions and the times of visual interactions have highlighted the value of visualizations for student learning and engagement [27], [51].…”
Section: Guidancementioning
confidence: 99%