2008
DOI: 10.5771/0935-9915-2008-4-291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negotiated Forms of Worker Involvement in the European Company (SE) –First Empirical Evidence and Conclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be easily seen that in Germany the SE is certainly not perceived as the 'saviour of boardlevel participation' -in fact, many see it as the opposite: a tool for circumventing existing national law, thereby facilitating deviations from well-established national standards and offering a backdoor for weakening comparatively high German participation standards. Empirical analysis has shown that a significant number of Germany-based SEs have used the SE form to the detriment of employee involvement (Eidenmüller et al, 2008;Keller and Werner, 2008a, 2008bKöstler and Werner, 2007). A recent analysis of German SE data by the Hans Böckler Foundation, however, comes to the conclusion that circumvention has been a key motive for setting up an SE only in individual cases and does not constitute a general trend (Hans- Böckler-Stiftung, 2010).…”
Section: Analysis Of Employee Involvement In Ses Developments In Different Member Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be easily seen that in Germany the SE is certainly not perceived as the 'saviour of boardlevel participation' -in fact, many see it as the opposite: a tool for circumventing existing national law, thereby facilitating deviations from well-established national standards and offering a backdoor for weakening comparatively high German participation standards. Empirical analysis has shown that a significant number of Germany-based SEs have used the SE form to the detriment of employee involvement (Eidenmüller et al, 2008;Keller and Werner, 2008a, 2008bKöstler and Werner, 2007). A recent analysis of German SE data by the Hans Böckler Foundation, however, comes to the conclusion that circumvention has been a key motive for setting up an SE only in individual cases and does not constitute a general trend (Hans- Böckler-Stiftung, 2010).…”
Section: Analysis Of Employee Involvement In Ses Developments In Different Member Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beaucoup la perçoivent, à l'inverse, comme un outil permettant de contourner la législation nationale existante et de faciliter les dérogations à des normes nationales bien établies, en créant une brèche qui permettra d'affaiblir les normes de participation allemande, comparativement élevées. Des analyses empiriques ont montré qu'un nombre significatif de SE basées en Allemagne ont utilisé la forme de la SE au détriment de la participation des salariés (Eidenmüller et al, 2008 ;Keller, Werner, 2008a, 2008bKöstler, Werner, 2007). Toutefois, une analyse des SE allemandes par la fondation Hans-Böckler est parvenue à la conclusion que la mise en place d'une SE n'a été inspirée par la volonté de contourner la loi que dans un nombre très limité de cas, et que ce phénomène ne constitue pas une tendance générale (Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, 2010).…”
Section: La Société Européenne Progrès Ou Menace En Matière De Drunclassified